Cheng Bin, Shao Jun
Department of Statistics, University of Wisconsin, Madison 53706, USA.
J Biopharm Stat. 2002 Aug;12(3):323-32. doi: 10.1081/bip-120014562.
For locally acting drug products such as nasal aerosols and nasal sprays, therapeutic equivalence between two drug products may be established by in vitro bioequivalence studies based on measurements intended to reflect the rate and extent to which the active ingredient becomes available at the site of action. For cascade impaction or multistage liquid impinger for particle size distribution, profile analysis is required. However, we find that the analysis procedure described in the 1999 FDA guidance lacks statistical justification. In this article, we explain why FDA's approach is incorrect and propose a correct statistical method for profile analysis using the basic ideas in the FDA guidance.
对于局部作用的药品,如鼻用气雾剂和鼻喷雾剂,两种药品之间的治疗等效性可通过体外生物等效性研究来确定,该研究基于旨在反映活性成分在作用部位可用的速率和程度的测量。对于用于粒度分布的级联撞击器或多级液体冲击器,需要进行图谱分析。然而,我们发现1999年FDA指南中描述的分析程序缺乏统计学依据。在本文中,我们解释了FDA方法为何不正确,并利用FDA指南中的基本思想提出了一种用于图谱分析的正确统计方法。