Suppr超能文献

药品质量研究机构对药用气雾剂级联撞击器图谱的评估。第3部分。关于确定等效性的统计程序的最终报告。

Product Quality Research Institute evaluation of cascade impactor profiles of pharmaceutical aerosols. Part 3. Final report on a statistical procedure for determining equivalence.

作者信息

Christopher David, Adams Wallace, Amann Anthony, Bertha Craig, Byron Peter R, Doub William, Dunbar Craig, Hauck Walter, Lyapustina Svetlana, Mitchell Jolyon, Morgan Beth, Nichols Steve, Pan Ziqing, Singh Gur Jai Pal, Tougas Terrence, Tsong Yi, Wolff Ron, Wyka Bruce

机构信息

Statistics, Schering-Plough Research Institute, Kenilworth, NJ, USA.

出版信息

AAPS PharmSciTech. 2007 Nov 2;8(4):E90. doi: 10.1208/pt0804090.

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to report final results of the evaluation of a chi-square ratio test proposed by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for demonstrating equivalence of aerodynamic particle size distribution (APSD) profiles of nasal and orally inhaled drug products. A working group of the Product Quality Research Institute previously published results demonstrating some limitations of the proposed test. In an effort to overcome the test's limited discrimination, the group proposed a supplemental test, a population bioequivalence (PBE) test for impactor-sized mass (ISM). In this final report the group compares the chi-square ratio test to the ISM-PBE test and to the combination of both tests. The basis for comparison is a set of 55 realistic scenarios of cascade impactor data, which were evaluated for equivalence by the statistical tests and independently by the group members. In many instances, the combined application of these 2 tests appeared to increase the discriminating ability of the statistical procedure compared with the chi-square ratio test alone. In certain situations the chi-square ratio test alone was sufficient to determine equivalence of APSD profiles, while in other situations neither of the tests alone nor their combination was adequate. This report describes all of these scenarios and results. In the end, the group did not recommend a statistical test for APSD profile equivalence. The group did not investigate other in vitro tests, in vivo issues, or other statistical tests for APSD profile comparisons. The studied tests are not intended for routine quality control of APSD.

摘要

本文旨在报告美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)提出的用于证明鼻腔和口服吸入药品的空气动力学粒径分布(APSD)曲线等效性的卡方比率检验的最终评估结果。产品质量研究机构的一个工作组此前发表的结果表明了该提议检验存在一些局限性。为了克服该检验辨别力有限的问题,该小组提出了一项补充检验,即针对撞击器粒径质量(ISM)的群体生物等效性(PBE)检验。在这份最终报告中,该小组将卡方比率检验与ISM-PBE检验以及两种检验的组合进行了比较。比较的基础是一组55个级联撞击器数据的实际场景,这些场景通过统计检验以及小组成员独立进行了等效性评估。在许多情况下,与单独使用卡方比率检验相比,这两种检验的联合应用似乎提高了统计程序的辨别能力。在某些情况下,单独使用卡方比率检验足以确定APSD曲线的等效性,而在其他情况下,单独的任何一种检验及其组合都不充分。本报告描述了所有这些场景和结果。最后,该小组没有推荐用于APSD曲线等效性的统计检验。该小组没有研究其他体外检验、体内问题或用于APSD曲线比较的其他统计检验。所研究的检验并非用于APSD的常规质量控制。

相似文献

3
4
In vitro and in vivo aspects of cascade impactor tests and inhaler performance: a review.
AAPS PharmSciTech. 2007 Dec 21;8(4):E110. doi: 10.1208/pt0804110.
5
Comparison of two approaches for treating cascade impaction mass balance measurements.
J Aerosol Med. 2007 Fall;20(3):236-56. doi: 10.1089/jam.2007.0609.
9
Improved quality control metrics for cascade impaction measurements of orally inhaled drug products (OIPs).
AAPS PharmSciTech. 2009;10(4):1276-85. doi: 10.1208/s12249-009-9312-4. Epub 2009 Oct 29.

引用本文的文献

2
8
In vitro and in vivo aspects of cascade impactor tests and inhaler performance: a review.
AAPS PharmSciTech. 2007 Dec 21;8(4):E110. doi: 10.1208/pt0804110.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验