Suppr超能文献

一种卡方比统计量修正版本的稳定性分析:对空气动力学粒径分布等效性检验的启示。

A stability analysis of a modified version of the chi-square ratio statistic: implications for equivalence testing of aerodynamic particle size distribution.

机构信息

Department of Pharmaceutics, College of Pharmacy, Center of Pharmacometrics and Systems Pharmacology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.

出版信息

AAPS J. 2013 Jan;15(1):1-9. doi: 10.1208/s12248-012-9410-1. Epub 2012 Sep 25.

Abstract

Demonstration of equivalence in aerodynamic particle size distribution (APSD; e.g., by comparing cascade impactor (CI) profiles) constitutes one of key in vitro tests for supporting bioequivalence between test (T) and reference (R) orally inhaled drug products (OIDPs). A chi-square ratio statistic (CSRS) was previously proposed for equivalence testing of CI profiles. However, it was reported that the CSRS could not consistently discriminate between equivalent and inequivalent CI profiles. The objective of the overall project was to develop a robust and sensitive methodology for assessing equivalence of APSD profiles of T and R OIDPs. We propose here a modified version of the CSRS (mCSRS) and evaluated systematically its behavior when T and R CI profiles were identical. Different scenarios comprising CI profiles with different number of deposition sites and shapes were generated by Monte-Carlo simulation. For each scenario, the mCSRS was applied to 20,000 independent sets of 30 T and 30 R CI profiles that were identical. Different metrics (including mean and median) of the distribution of 900 mCSRSs (30 T × 30 R) were then evaluated for their suitability as a test statistic (i.e., independent of the number of sites and shape of the CI profile) for APSD equivalence testing. The median of the distribution of 900 mCSRSs (MmCSRS) was one regardless of the number of sites and shape of the CI profile. Hence, the MmCSRS is a robust metric for CI profile equivalence testing when T and R CI profiles are identical and potentially useful for APSD equivalence testing.

摘要

在空气动力学粒径分布(APSD;例如,通过比较级联冲击器(CI)谱)等效性的证明构成了支持测试(T)和参考(R)口服药物产品(OIDP)之间生物等效性的关键体外测试之一。之前已经提出了卡方比值统计量(CSRS)用于 CI 谱的等效性测试。然而,据报道,CSRS 不能始终区分等效和不等效的 CI 谱。该项目的总体目标是开发一种用于评估 T 和 R OIDP 的 APSD 谱等效性的稳健和敏感方法。我们在这里提出了 CSRS 的一种改进版本(mCSRS),并系统地评估了其在 T 和 R CI 谱完全相同时的行为。通过蒙特卡罗模拟生成了具有不同沉积部位和形状的 CI 谱的不同场景。对于每个场景,将 mCSRS 应用于 30 个 T 和 30 个 R CI 谱完全相同的 20,000 个独立集合。然后,对 900 个 mCSRS(30 T×30 R)分布的不同指标(包括均值和中位数)进行评估,以确定其作为 APSD 等效性测试的检验统计量(即独立于 CI 谱的沉积部位数量和形状)的适用性。900 个 mCSRS 分布的中位数(MmCSRS)是一个,与 CI 谱的沉积部位数量和形状无关。因此,当 T 和 R CI 谱相同时,MmCSRS 是 CI 谱等效性测试的稳健指标,并且可能对 APSD 等效性测试有用。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验