Suppr超能文献

评估证据:系统审查不同的数据。

Appraising the evidence: reviewing disparate data systematically.

作者信息

Hawker Sheila, Payne Sheila, Kerr Christine, Hardey Michael, Powell Jackie

机构信息

Department of Social Work Studies, University of Southampton, UK.

出版信息

Qual Health Res. 2002 Nov;12(9):1284-99. doi: 10.1177/1049732302238251.

Abstract

The authors describe a method of systematically reviewing research from different paradigms. They draw on the methods adapted, developed, and designed during a study concerned with the delivery of care across professional boundaries. Informed by the established method of systematic review, the authors undertook the review in distinct stages. They describe the methods developed for each stage and outline the difficulties encountered, the solutions devised, and the appraisal tools developed. Although many of the problems encountered were related to the critical assessment of qualitative research, the authors argue that the method of systematic review can be adapted for use with different data andacross disciplines.

摘要

作者描述了一种系统回顾不同范式研究的方法。他们借鉴了在一项关于跨专业界限提供护理的研究中采用、发展和设计的方法。在既定的系统回顾方法的指导下,作者分不同阶段进行了回顾。他们描述了为每个阶段开发的方法,概述了遇到的困难、设计的解决方案以及开发的评估工具。尽管遇到的许多问题与定性研究的批判性评估有关,但作者认为系统回顾方法可以适用于不同的数据并跨学科使用。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验