Brandt Tobias
Department of Neurology, University of Heidelberg School of Medicine, Heidelberg, Germany.
Clin Exp Hypertens. 2002 Oct-Nov;24(7-8):611-22. doi: 10.1081/ceh-120015337.
Acute basilar artery (BA) occlusion is associated with an extremely high mortality. The pathogenesis in younger patients is usually embolism form cardiac sources or less frequently from vertebral artery dissection. Local atherothrombosis is more common in elderly patients. Differently to the carotid territory, for the vertebrobasilar territory there are no placebo controlled studies proving efficacy of thrombolytic treatment. Furthermore, neither the best route of administration nor the best fibrinolytic agent have been evaluated. Several uncontrolled series, however, indicate that intraarterial thrombolysis reduces mortality of patients with BA occlusion. Recanalization rates average 60% and are associated with occlusions of embolic etiology. Mortality with an average rate of 40-60% is significantly lower in the recanalization group in most series. Other independent variables affecting mortality are identified as length of obstruction, proximal BA occlusion, collateralization, high age, and initial poor clinical state. Time from onset of symptoms to start of intraarterial thrombolysis, however, is not associated with recanalization or mortality rate. This indicates that differently from thrombolytic treatment in the anterior circulation there is no fixed time window in BA thrombosis. Rate ofparenchymal hemorrhage seems to be lower with an average of 6% compared with systemic thrombolytic therapy in hemispheric stroke. Recanalization of the BA is clinically beneficial under certain circumstances only: (1) BA occlusion should affect only one segment; (2) an effective collateral supply is essential; and (3) the patient should not already be tetraplegic or comatose for a longer period of time. Clinical outcome and assessment of quality of life on follow-up of survivors with successful recanalization encourage thrombolysis in acute BA occlusions of embolic origin.
急性基底动脉闭塞的死亡率极高。年轻患者的发病机制通常是心脏来源的栓塞,较少见的是椎动脉夹层形成。局部动脉粥样硬化血栓形成在老年患者中更为常见。与颈动脉区域不同,对于椎基底动脉区域,尚无安慰剂对照研究证明溶栓治疗的有效性。此外,最佳给药途径和最佳纤溶药物均未得到评估。然而,一些非对照系列研究表明,动脉内溶栓可降低基底动脉闭塞患者的死亡率。再通率平均为60%,与栓塞性病因导致的闭塞相关。在大多数系列研究中,再通组的死亡率平均为40%-60%,显著低于未再通组。其他影响死亡率的独立变量包括阻塞长度、基底动脉近端闭塞、侧支循环、高龄和初始临床状态不佳。然而,从症状发作到开始动脉内溶栓的时间与再通或死亡率无关。这表明与前循环的溶栓治疗不同,基底动脉血栓形成没有固定的时间窗。与半球性卒中的全身溶栓治疗相比,实质内出血率似乎较低,平均为6%。基底动脉再通仅在某些情况下具有临床益处:(1)基底动脉闭塞应仅累及一个节段;(2)有效的侧支循环供应至关重要;(3)患者不应已经四肢瘫痪或昏迷较长时间。成功再通的幸存者随访时的临床结局和生活质量评估鼓励对栓塞性起源的急性基底动脉闭塞进行溶栓治疗。