• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

选择性视觉注意的时间进程:理论与实验

The time course of selective visual attention: theory and experiments.

作者信息

Deco Gustavo, Pollatos Olga, Zihl Josef

机构信息

Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT IC 4, Munich, Germany.

出版信息

Vision Res. 2002 Dec;42(27):2925-45. doi: 10.1016/s0042-6989(02)00358-9.

DOI:10.1016/s0042-6989(02)00358-9
PMID:12450503
Abstract

Historically, the psychophysical evidence for "selective attention" originated mainly from visual search experiments. A first important distinction in the processing of information in visual search tasks is its separation in two stages. The first, early "preattentive" stage operates in parallel across the entire visual field extracting single "primitive features" without integrating them. The second "attentive" stage corresponds to the specialized integration of information from a limited part of the field at any one time, i.e. serially. So far, models based on the above mentioned two-stage processes have been able to distinguish features from conjunction search conditions based on the observed slopes of the linear relation between reaction time (i.e., search time) and the number of items in the stimulus array. We propose a neuroscience based model for visual attention that works across the visual field in parallel, but due to its intrinsic dynamics can show the two experimentally observed modes of visual attention, namely: the serial focal attention and the parallel spread of attention over space. The model demonstrates that neither explicit serial focal search nor saliency maps need to be assumed. In the present model the focus of attention is not included in the system but only emerges after convergence of the dynamical behaviour of the neural networks. Furthermore, existing models have not been able to explain the variation of slopes observed in different kinds of conjunction search modes. We hypothesize that the different slopes can be explained by assuming that selective attention is guided by an independent mechanism which corresponds to the independent search for each feature. The model consistently integrates the different neuroscience levels by considering the microscopic neurodynamical mechanism that underlies visual attention, the different brain areas of the dorsal or "where" and ventral or "what" paths of the visual cortex, and behavioural data.

摘要

从历史上看,“选择性注意”的心理物理学证据主要源自视觉搜索实验。视觉搜索任务中信息处理的一个重要首要区别在于其分为两个阶段。第一个阶段是早期的“前注意”阶段,它在整个视野范围内并行运作,提取单个“原始特征”而不进行整合。第二个“注意”阶段则对应于在任何时刻对来自视野有限部分的信息进行专门整合,即串行整合。到目前为止,基于上述两阶段过程的模型能够根据观察到的反应时间(即搜索时间)与刺激阵列中项目数量之间线性关系的斜率,区分特征搜索条件和联合搜索条件。我们提出了一种基于神经科学的视觉注意模型,该模型在整个视野范围内并行运作,但由于其内在动力学特性,能够展现出两种实验观察到的视觉注意模式,即:串行焦点注意和注意力在空间上的并行扩散。该模型表明,既不需要假设明确的串行焦点搜索,也不需要假设显著性图。在当前模型中,注意焦点并不包含在系统中,而是仅在神经网络动力学行为收敛后才出现。此外,现有模型一直无法解释在不同类型联合搜索模式中观察到的斜率变化。我们假设,通过假定选择性注意由一种独立机制引导,该机制对应于对每个特征的独立搜索,可以解释不同的斜率。该模型通过考虑构成视觉注意基础的微观神经动力学机制、视觉皮层背侧或“哪里”以及腹侧或“什么”路径的不同脑区以及行为数据,始终如一地整合了不同的神经科学层面。

相似文献

1
The time course of selective visual attention: theory and experiments.选择性视觉注意的时间进程:理论与实验
Vision Res. 2002 Dec;42(27):2925-45. doi: 10.1016/s0042-6989(02)00358-9.
2
Serial vs. parallel models of attention in visual search: accounting for benchmark RT-distributions.视觉搜索中注意力的串行与并行模型:解释基准反应时分布
Psychon Bull Rev. 2016 Oct;23(5):1300-1315. doi: 10.3758/s13423-015-0978-1.
3
A neurodynamical model of visual attention: feedback enhancement of spatial resolution in a hierarchical system.视觉注意力的神经动力学模型:分层系统中空间分辨率的反馈增强
J Comput Neurosci. 2001 May-Jun;10(3):231-53. doi: 10.1023/a:1011233530729.
4
Clear distinction between preattentive and attentive process in schizophrenia by visual search performance.通过视觉搜索表现明确区分精神分裂症患者的前注意和注意过程。
Psychiatry Res. 2007 Jan 15;149(1-3):25-31. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2006.01.014. Epub 2006 Nov 21.
5
A saliency-based search mechanism for overt and covert shifts of visual attention.一种基于显著性的视觉注意显性和隐性转移搜索机制。
Vision Res. 2000;40(10-12):1489-506. doi: 10.1016/s0042-6989(99)00163-7.
6
A neural network implementation of a saliency map model.一种显著性地图模型的神经网络实现。
Neural Netw. 2006 Dec;19(10):1467-74. doi: 10.1016/j.neunet.2005.12.004. Epub 2006 May 9.
7
The integration of parallel and serial processing mechanisms in visual search: evidence from eye movement recording.视觉搜索中并行和串行处理机制的整合:来自眼动记录的证据。
Eur J Neurosci. 2001 Jan;13(2):364-72.
8
Attention and visual search.注意力与视觉搜索。
Int J Neural Syst. 2007 Aug;17(4):275-88. doi: 10.1142/S0129065707001135.
9
What underlies visual selective attention development? Evidence that age-related improvements in visual feature integration influence visual selective attention performance.视觉选择性注意发展的基础是什么?证据表明,与年龄相关的视觉特征整合的改善会影响视觉选择性注意的表现。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2020 Mar;191:104732. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2019.104732. Epub 2019 Nov 23.
10
Feature integration theory in non-humans: Spotlight on the archerfish.非人类的特征整合理论:聚焦射水鱼。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2020 Feb;82(2):752-774. doi: 10.3758/s13414-019-01884-4.

引用本文的文献

1
Periodic attention operates faster during more complex visual search.在更复杂的视觉搜索过程中,周期性注意力的运作速度更快。
Sci Rep. 2022 Apr 23;12(1):6688. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-10647-5.
2
Analysis of Biased Competition and Cooperation for Attention in the Cerebral Cortex.大脑皮层中注意力的偏向竞争与合作分析
Front Comput Neurosci. 2019 Jul 31;13:51. doi: 10.3389/fncom.2019.00051. eCollection 2019.
3
Contribution of FEF to Attentional Periodicity during Visual Search: A TMS Study.FEF 在视觉搜索注意周期中的作用:一项 TMS 研究。
eNeuro. 2019 Jun 24;6(3). doi: 10.1523/ENEURO.0357-18.2019. Print 2019 May/Jun.
4
Systematic assessment of intrinsic factors influencing visual attention performances in air traffic control via clustering algorithm and statistical inference.基于聚类算法和统计推断的空中交通管制中视觉注意力表现的内在因素的系统评估。
PLoS One. 2018 Oct 25;13(10):e0205334. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0205334. eCollection 2018.
5
First unitary, then divided: the temporal dynamics of dividing attention.首先统一,然后再分散:注意分配的时间动态。
Psychol Res. 2019 Oct;83(7):1426-1443. doi: 10.1007/s00426-018-1018-3. Epub 2018 Apr 24.
6
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Reveals Intrinsic Perceptual and Attentional Rhythms.经颅磁刺激揭示内在感知和注意力节律。
Front Neurosci. 2017 Mar 27;11:154. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2017.00154. eCollection 2017.
7
How Task Goals Mediate the Interplay between Perception and Action.任务目标如何调解感知与行动的相互作用。
Front Psychol. 2013 May 7;4:247. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00247. eCollection 2013.
8
Interhemispheric integration in visual search.半球间视觉搜索的整合。
Neuropsychologia. 2011 Jul;49(9):2630-47. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.05.011. Epub 2011 May 27.
9
Transcranial magnetic stimulation reveals attentional feedback to area V1 during serial visual search.经颅磁刺激揭示了在序列视觉搜索过程中,注意力对 V1 区的反馈。
PLoS One. 2011;6(5):e19712. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0019712. Epub 2011 May 17.
10
Surround suppression sharpens the priority map in the lateral intraparietal area.周围抑制使顶内沟外侧区的优先图变得尖锐。
J Neurosci. 2010 Sep 22;30(38):12787-97. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2327-10.2010.