Hansson Bengt, Westerberg Lars
Department of Animal Ecology, Ecology Building, Lund University, 223 62 Lund, Sweden.
Mol Ecol. 2002 Dec;11(12):2467-74. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-294x.2002.01644.x.
Three primary hypotheses currently prevail for correlations between heterozygosity at a set of molecular markers and fitness in natural populations. First, multilocus heterozygosity-fitness correlations might result from selection acting directly on the scored loci, such as at particular allozyme loci. Second, significant levels of linkage disequilibrium, as in recently bottlenecked-and-expanded populations, might cause associations between the markers and fitness loci in the local chromosomal vicinity. Third, in partially inbred populations, heterozygosity at the markers might reflect variation in the inbreeding coefficient and might associate with fitness as a result of effects of homozygosity at genome-wide distributed loci. Despite years of research, the relative importance of these hypotheses remains unclear. The screening of heterozygosity at polymorphic DNA markers offers an opportunity to resolve this issue, and relevant empirical studies have now emerged. We provide an account of the recent progress on the subject, and give suggestions on how to distinguish between the three hypotheses in future studies.
目前,关于一组分子标记的杂合性与自然种群适应性之间的相关性,存在三种主要假说。第一,多位点杂合性-适应性相关性可能源于直接作用于所测位点的选择,比如在特定的等位酶位点。第二,像在近期经历瓶颈效应并扩张的种群中那样,显著水平的连锁不平衡可能导致标记与局部染色体附近的适应性位点之间产生关联。第三,在部分近亲繁殖的种群中,标记处的杂合性可能反映了近亲繁殖系数的变化,并且可能由于全基因组分布位点的纯合性效应而与适应性相关联。尽管经过多年研究,这些假说的相对重要性仍不明确。对多态性DNA标记处杂合性的筛选为解决这一问题提供了契机,相关实证研究现已出现。我们阐述了该主题的最新进展,并就如何在未来研究中区分这三种假说给出建议。