Haggard P, Wing A
Department of Psychology, University College London, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, UK.
J Mot Behav. 1997 Sep;29(3):282-7. doi: 10.1080/00222899709600842.
Jeannerod (1981) proposed that prehensile movements involve two independent visuomotor channels that are responsible for hand transport and hand aperture. In many studies, the movement of a marker placed on the wrist has been used as an index of hand transport because wrist movement is unaffected by the movements of the digits responsible for hand aperture. In the present study, the spatial paths of the wrist, index finger, and thumb of 5 adults, each performing 50 reaching movements, were measured with a WATSMART movement tracking system, and their variability was analyzed. The measures of movement variability suggest that the motor system is more concerned with thumb position than with wrist position during hand transport. Although the wrist is a technically convenient index of hand transport, the thumb may be a more appropriate index from the point of view of motor control
让内罗德(1981年)提出,抓握动作涉及两个独立的视觉运动通道,分别负责手部移动和手的张合。在许多研究中,置于手腕上的标记物的移动被用作手部移动的指标,因为手腕的移动不受负责手张合的手指动作的影响。在本研究中,使用WATSMART运动跟踪系统测量了5名成年人的手腕、食指和拇指的空间路径,每人进行50次伸手动作,并分析了其变异性。运动变异性的测量结果表明,在手部移动过程中,运动系统对手指位置的关注超过对手腕位置的关注。虽然从技术角度看,手腕是手部移动的便利指标,但从运动控制的角度来看,拇指可能是更合适的指标。