Richardson David C, Ciach Michele, Zhong Kathleen J Y, Crandall Ian, Kain Kevin C
Tropical Disease Unit, Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
J Clin Microbiol. 2002 Dec;40(12):4528-30. doi: 10.1128/JCM.40.12.4528-4530.2002.
Microscopy has been the traditional reference standard for malaria diagnosis. However, difficulty in maintaining the required technical skills, particularly in areas where malaria is not endemic, has prompted the development of rapid nonmicroscopic diagnostic assays based on the detection of malaria parasite antigen in whole blood. In this study, we evaluated the performance of one such device, the Makromed dipstick test, blindly compared to PCR and microscopy for the diagnosis of Plasmodium falciparum malaria in 200 febrile returned travelers. The Makromed assay detects the presence of P. falciparum-specific histidine-rich protein II with an antigen capture immunochromatographic strip format. Compared to PCR as the reference standard, the dipstick assay had a sensitivity of 97.0% and a specificity of 96.0%. The positive and negative predictive values were 81.2% and 99.5%, respectively. Rapid malaria diagnostic devices may provide a useful diagnostic adjunct in a clinical setting.
显微镜检查一直是疟疾诊断的传统参考标准。然而,维持所需技术技能存在困难,尤其是在疟疾非流行地区,这促使人们开发基于检测全血中疟原虫抗原的快速非显微镜诊断检测方法。在本研究中,我们对一种此类检测设备——Makromed试纸条检测法进行了性能评估,将其与聚合酶链反应(PCR)和显微镜检查法进行盲法比较,以诊断200名发热回国旅行者中的恶性疟原虫疟疾。Makromed检测法采用抗原捕获免疫层析试纸条形式检测恶性疟原虫特异性富含组氨酸蛋白II的存在。与作为参考标准的PCR相比,试纸条检测法的灵敏度为97.0%,特异性为96.0%。阳性和阴性预测值分别为81.2%和99.5%。快速疟疾诊断设备在临床环境中可能提供有用的诊断辅助手段。