Offersen B V, Knap M M, Marcussen N, Horsman M R, Hamilton-Dutoit S, Overgaard J
Department of Experimental Clinical Oncology, Danish Cancer Society, Aarhus University Hospital, Noerrebrogade 44, bldg 5, DK-8000 Aarhus C, Denmark.
Br J Cancer. 2002 Dec 2;87(12):1422-30. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6600615.
The aim of this study was to investigate the prognostic influence of microvessel density using the hot spot method in 107 patients diagnosed with transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder. In each case, inflammation was found in the invasive carcinoma, therefore we classified the degree of inflammation as minimal, moderate or intense. Microvessel density was then reevaluated in each tumour in areas corresponding to these three categories. Median microvessel density irrespective of degree of inflammation was 71. Areas of minimal, moderate and intense inflammation were found in 48, 92 and 32 tumours. Microvessel density increased significantly with increasing degree of inflammation. Disease-specific survival was improved if areas of intense inflammation were present in the carcinoma (P=0.004). High microvessel density, irrespective of the degree of inflammation, was associated with a significantly better disease-specific survival (P=0.01). Multivariate analysis using death of disease as endpoint demonstrated an independent prognostic value of N-classification (N0, hazard ratio (HR)=1 vs N1, HR=2.89 (range, 1.52-5.52) vs N2, HR=3.61 (range, 1.84-7.08)), and intense inflammation, HR=0.48 (range, 0.24-0.96). Malignancy grade, T classification and microvessel density were not independent significant markers of poor outcome. In conclusion, inflammation was significantly correlated to microvessel density, and areas of intense inflammation were an independent marker of good prognosis.
本研究旨在采用热点法调查微血管密度对107例诊断为膀胱移行细胞癌患者的预后影响。在每例病例中,浸润性癌均发现有炎症,因此我们将炎症程度分为轻度、中度或重度。然后在与这三类相对应的区域对每个肿瘤的微血管密度进行重新评估。无论炎症程度如何,微血管密度中位数为71。在48、92和32个肿瘤中发现了轻度、中度和重度炎症区域。微血管密度随炎症程度的增加而显著增加。如果癌组织中存在重度炎症区域,则疾病特异性生存率会提高(P=0.004)。无论炎症程度如何,高微血管密度与显著更好的疾病特异性生存率相关(P=0.01)。以疾病死亡为终点的多因素分析显示N分期具有独立的预后价值(N0,风险比(HR)=1;N1,HR=2.89(范围1.52 - 5.52);N2,HR=3.61(范围1.84 - 7.08)),以及重度炎症,HR=0.48(范围0.24 - 0.96)。恶性肿瘤分级、T分期和微血管密度不是不良预后的独立显著标志物。总之,炎症与微血管密度显著相关,重度炎症区域是良好预后的独立标志物。