Department of Surgery and Medical Specialties. Networking Research Center on Bioengineering, Biomaterials and Nanomedicine (CIBER-BBN). Faculty of Medicine, Alcalá University, Alcalá de Henares, Madrid, Spain.
PLoS One. 2013 Nov 13;8(11):e80647. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0080647. eCollection 2013.
Composite biomaterials designed for the repair of abdominal wall defects are composed of a mesh component and a laminar barrier in contact with the visceral peritoneum. This study assesses the behaviour of a new composite mesh by comparing it with two latest-generation composites currently used in clinical practice.
Defects (7x5cm) created in the anterior abdominal wall of New Zealand White rabbits were repaired using a polypropylene mesh and the composites: Physiomesh(TM); Ventralight(TM) and a new composite mesh with a three-dimensional macroporous polyester structure and an oxidized collagen/chitosan barrier. Animals were sacrificed on days 14 and 90 postimplant. Specimens were processed to determine host tissue incorporation, gene/protein expression of neo-collagens (RT-PCR/immunofluorescence), macrophage response (RAM-11-immunolabelling) and biomechanical resistance. On postoperative days 7/14, each animal was examined laparoscopically to quantify adhesions between the visceral peritoneum and implant.
The new composite mesh showed the lowest incidence of seroma in the short term. At each time point, the mesh surface covered with adhesions was greater in controls than composites. By day 14, the implants were fully infiltrated by a loose connective tissue that became denser over time. At 90 days, the peritoneal mesh surface was lined with a stable mesothelium. The new composite mesh induced more rapid tissue maturation than Physiomesh(TM), giving rise to a neoformed tissue containing more type I collagen. In Ventralight(TM) the macrophage reaction was intense and significantly greater than the other composites at both follow-up times. Tensile strengths were similar for each biomaterial.
All composites showed optimal peritoneal behaviour, inducing good peritoneal regeneration and scarce postoperative adhesion formation. A greater foreign body reaction was observed for Ventralight(TM). All composites induced good collagen deposition accompanied by optimal tensile strength. The three-dimensional macroporous structure of the new composite mesh may promote rapid tissue regeneration within the mesh.
设计用于修复腹壁缺损的复合生物材料由一个网片组件和一个与内脏腹膜接触的层状屏障组成。本研究通过将一种新的复合网片与两种目前临床应用的最新一代复合材料进行比较,来评估这种新复合网片的性能。
在新西兰白兔的前腹壁上创建 7x5cm 的缺损,使用聚丙烯网片和以下复合材料进行修复:Physiomesh(TM);Ventralight(TM)和一种新的复合网片,具有三维大孔聚酯结构和氧化胶原/壳聚糖屏障。在植入后第 14 天和第 90 天处死动物。处理标本以确定宿主组织的整合、新胶原的基因/蛋白表达(RT-PCR/免疫荧光)、巨噬细胞反应(RAM-11 免疫标记)和生物力学阻力。在术后第 7/14 天,对每个动物进行腹腔镜检查,以量化内脏腹膜与植入物之间的粘连。
新的复合网片在短期内表现出最低的血清肿发生率。在每个时间点,与复合材料相比,覆盖有粘连的网片表面更大。在第 14 天,植入物被疏松结缔组织完全浸润,随着时间的推移变得更加致密。在第 90 天,腹膜网片表面衬有稳定的间皮。新的复合网片比 Physiomesh(TM)更早地诱导组织成熟,形成含有更多 I 型胶原的新生组织。在 Ventralight(TM)中,巨噬细胞反应强烈,在两次随访时都明显大于其他复合材料。每种生物材料的拉伸强度相似。
所有复合材料均表现出最佳的腹膜性能,诱导良好的腹膜再生和术后粘连形成较少。Ventralight(TM)观察到更大的异物反应。所有复合材料均诱导良好的胶原沉积,同时保持最佳的拉伸强度。新复合网片的三维大孔结构可能会促进网片内的快速组织再生。