Miller Jessica M, DiIorio Colleen, Dudley William
Department of Health Policy and Management, Social and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
J Adolesc Health. 2002 Dec;31(6):463-8. doi: 10.1016/s1054-139x(02)00452-4.
To determine if the reactions of adolescents toward hypothetical situations that can lead to conflict and violence varied by parenting style of their mothers.
This study was part of a larger research project involving adolescents and their mothers participating in a longitudinal HIV-prevention program. Mothers and their adolescents were recruited from a community-based organization (CBO) and interviewed separately. Data were analyzed using the responses of 439 African-American adolescents ranging from ages 11 to 14 years. The responses of adolescents to questions about parenting were used to classify mothers into one of three parenting styles: authoritative, authoritarian, or permissive. The "anticipated reactions to hypothetical situations" scale consists of 11 items with 6 response categories. The six responses were reclassified into three categories ranging from "not at all violent" to "extremely violent." Higher scores indicate more violent reactions to the hypothetical situations. The parenting scale consists of two subscales: a 13-item parental involvement scale and a 13-item parental control scale. Items were rated on a 5-point Likert scale from "strongly disagree" to "strongly agree." Analysis of variance was used to determine if the anticipated reactions of adolescents toward hypothetical situations varied by parenting style of their mothers.
Adolescent participants who reported a more permissive parenting style expressed more intense negative reactions toward the hypothetical situations that can provoke conflict. Male adolescents also expressed more intense reactions than females to the situations. There was no difference in intensity of reaction by age after controlling for gender and parenting style.
Parenting style is associated with adolescents' reactions to hypothetical situations that can provoke conflict. This finding highlights the importance of considering parents and their approach to child-rearing as a factor in the adolescent's ability to react to conflict.
确定青少年对可能导致冲突和暴力的假设情境的反应是否因母亲的养育方式而异。
本研究是一个更大的研究项目的一部分,该项目涉及参与纵向艾滋病毒预防计划的青少年及其母亲。母亲及其青少年从一个社区组织(CBO)招募,并分别接受访谈。使用439名年龄在11至14岁之间的非裔美国青少年的回答进行数据分析。青少年对育儿问题的回答被用来将母亲分为三种养育方式之一:权威型、专制型或放任型。“对假设情境的预期反应”量表由11个项目组成,有6个反应类别。这六个反应被重新分类为从“完全不暴力”到“极其暴力”的三个类别。得分越高表明对假设情境的反应越暴力。养育量表由两个子量表组成:一个13项的父母参与量表和一个13项的父母控制量表。项目根据从“强烈不同意”到“强烈同意”的5点李克特量表进行评分。方差分析用于确定青少年对假设情境的预期反应是否因母亲的养育方式而异。
报告养育方式更放任的青少年参与者对可能引发冲突的假设情境表达了更强烈的负面反应。男性青少年对这些情境的反应也比女性更强烈。在控制了性别和养育方式后,反应强度在年龄上没有差异。
养育方式与青少年对可能引发冲突的假设情境的反应有关。这一发现凸显了将父母及其育儿方式作为影响青少年应对冲突能力的一个因素加以考虑的重要性。