Suppr超能文献

青少年时期的养育方式与父母权威观念

Parenting styles and conceptions of parental authority during adolescence.

作者信息

Smetana J G

机构信息

Warner Graduate School of Education and Human Development, University of Rochester, NY 14627, USA.

出版信息

Child Dev. 1995 Apr;66(2):299-316. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.1995.tb00872.x.

Abstract

Reports of parenting styles were assessed in 110 primarily white, middle-class sixth, eighth, and tenth graders (M = 11.98, 13.84, and 16.18 years of age) and their parents (108 mothers and 92 fathers). Parents judged the legitimacy of parental authority and rated family conflict and rules regarding 24 hypothetical moral, conventional, personal, multifaceted (containing conventional and personal components), prudential, and friendship issues. Adolescents viewed their parents as more permissive and more authoritarian than parents viewed themselves, whereas parents viewed themselves as more authoritative than did adolescents. Parents' parenting styles differentiated their conceptions of parental authority, but adolescents' perceptions did not. Differences were primarily over the boundaries of adolescents' personal jurisdiction. Furthermore, conceptions of parental authority and parenting styles both contributed significantly to emotional autonomy and adolescent-parent conflict. The implications of the findings for typological models of parenting and distinct domain views of social-cognitive development are discussed.

摘要

研究人员对110名主要为白人、来自中产阶级家庭的六年级、八年级和十年级学生(平均年龄分别为11.98岁、13.84岁和16.18岁)及其父母(108名母亲和92名父亲)的养育方式报告进行了评估。父母对父母权威的合理性进行了评判,并对家庭冲突以及关于24个假设的道德、习俗、个人、多方面(包含习俗和个人成分)、审慎和友谊问题的规则进行了评分。青少年认为他们的父母比父母自己认为的更宽容、更专制,而父母认为自己比青少年所认为的更具权威性。父母的养育方式区分了他们对父母权威的概念,但青少年的认知并没有。差异主要体现在青少年个人管辖权的边界上。此外,父母权威的概念和养育方式都对情感自主性和青少年与父母的冲突有显著影响。文中讨论了这些研究结果对养育类型模型和社会认知发展的不同领域观点的启示。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验