Suppr超能文献

四种血管紧张素Ⅱ1型受体阻滞剂的剂量与降压效果之间的关系。效价和疗效的差异。

The relationships between dose and antihypertensive effect of four AT1-receptor blockers. Differences in potency and efficacy.

作者信息

Elmfeldt Dag, Olofsson Bertil, Meredith Peter

机构信息

Clinical Science, AstraZeneca R&D, Mölndal, Sweden.

出版信息

Blood Press. 2002;11(5):293-301. doi: 10.1080/080370502320779502.

Abstract

The relationships between dose and antihypertensive effect of the first four available AT1-receptor blockers. i.e. losartan, valsartan, irbesartan and candesartan, were assessed based on data obtained from the FDA's evaluation reports of the respective New Drug Application files. All available randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group studies in adult men and women with mild to moderate primary diastolic hypertension were included, provided that the reduction in trough (24 h post-dose) supine or sitting diastolic blood pressure (DBP) had been assessed using the intention-to-treat approach. All studies had an initial single-blind placebo run-in period followed by at least 4 weeks double-blind treatment. The selected studies were included in a meta-analysis of the dose-response relationship for each drug. The dose-response relationship was estimated by fitting the placebo-adjusted, weighted mean reductions in DBP for each dose of the drug to an Emax model. The Emax (maximal effect at an infinitely large dose) for the reduction in DBP, with corresponding 95% confidence intervals in brackets, were found to be 5.6 (3.6-7.5) mmHg for losartan, 5.8 (5.0-6.6) mmHg for valsartan, 6.9 (5.9-7.9) mmHg for irbesartan and 7.5 (6.1-8.9) mmHg for candesartan (p = 0.014, candesartan vs valsartan). In conclusion, this investigation demonstrates that candesartan can reduce DBP significantly more than valsartan, and is supportive of previous head-to-head comparisons, which have proven candesartan to have a greater antihypertensive effect than losartan at recommended doses. Thus, differences in efficacy between different AT1-receptor blockers do exist, and should have implications for the choice of AT1-receptor blocker when treating patients with hypertension, considering the importance of good blood pressure control.

摘要

基于从美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)各自新药申请文件的评估报告中获取的数据,对首批四种上市的血管紧张素Ⅱ1型受体(AT1)阻滞剂,即氯沙坦、缬沙坦、厄贝沙坦和坎地沙坦的剂量与降压效果之间的关系进行了评估。纳入了所有针对成年男女轻至中度原发性舒张期高血压患者的随机、双盲、安慰剂对照、平行组研究,前提是采用意向性分析方法评估谷值(给药后24小时)仰卧位或坐位舒张压(DBP)的降低情况。所有研究均有一个初始单盲安慰剂导入期,随后进行至少4周的双盲治疗。将选定的研究纳入每种药物剂量反应关系的荟萃分析。通过将每种药物剂量的安慰剂校正加权平均DBP降低值拟合到Emax模型来估计剂量反应关系。DBP降低的Emax(无限大剂量时的最大效应)及相应的95%置信区间(括号内)分别为:氯沙坦5.6(3.6 - 7.5)mmHg,缬沙坦5.8(5.0 - 6.6)mmHg,厄贝沙坦6.9(5.9 - 7.9)mmHg,坎地沙坦7.5(6.1 - 8.9)mmHg(p = 0.014,坎地沙坦与缬沙坦比较)。总之,本研究表明坎地沙坦降低DBP的幅度显著大于缬沙坦,支持了先前的直接比较结果,即已证实坎地沙坦在推荐剂量下比氯沙坦具有更强的降压效果。因此,不同AT1受体阻滞剂之间确实存在疗效差异,考虑到良好血压控制的重要性,这对于高血压患者治疗中AT1受体阻滞剂的选择具有重要意义。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验