Blattert Thomas R, Delling Günter, Dalal Paresh S, Toth Carol A, Balling Horst, Weckbach Arnulf
Trauma and Reconstructive Surgery, Würzburg University Hospital, Germany.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2002 Dec 1;27(23):2697-705. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200212010-00009.
Transpedicular lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) was performed in a sheep model comparing three treatment groups: a composite of osteogenic protein (OP)-1 and hydroxyapatite carrier (HA), HA without OP-1, and autograft.
To evaluate the efficacy of the composite of OP-1 and HA (HA-OP-1) in achieving reliable TLIF.
Anterior fusion techniques directly address disc-related problems and achieve primary axial stability. However, they are characterized by high morbidity. Alternatively, the theoretically advantageous posterior TLIF technique using autograft fails clinically because it lacks compressive stability.
In 36 sheep, lumbar vertebrae L4 to L6 were instrumented posteriorly. Endoscopically assisted TLIF of L4 to L5 was performed. In 12 sheep, the defect was filled with injectable HA-OP-1. Another 12 sheep were treated with HA and another 12 with autograft. Animals were killed at 8 weeks and evaluated by radiologic, histologic, and histomorphometric analysis and by fluorochrome labeling.
Only 10 autograft sheep were available for evaluation. Radiologically and histologically, TLIF with HA-OP-1 led to a fusion rate of 10 in 12 compared with autograft (one in 10 fused) and HA (two in 12 fused) ( = 0.0016). Semiquantitative radiologic and histologic scoring also revealed significant differences with superiority of HA-OP-1 ( = 0.0011). Compared with HA, HA-OP-1 presented significantly more ossification at the bone-cement interface ( = 0.0003) and less cement resorption ( = 0.0209). In four of 12 HA sheep, excessive resorption was responsible for local aseptic inflammation.
Biointegration of the osteoconductive HA does not occur, because shear forces cause early HA fracture, subsequent fragmentation, and gross resorption (initiating severe inflammation in four of 12 sheep). In contrast, osteoinductive effects of HA-OP-1 enable bio-integration, resulting in full osseous composite sheathing and solid fusion. By use of this composite, TLIF is successfully applied in sheep. Harvesting autograft and the anterior approach are avoided.
在绵羊模型中进行经椎弓根腰椎椎间融合术(TLIF),比较三个治疗组:骨形成蛋白(OP)-1与羟基磷灰石载体(HA)的复合物、不含OP-1的HA以及自体骨移植。
评估OP-1与HA的复合物(HA-OP-1)在实现可靠的TLIF中的疗效。
前路融合技术可直接解决椎间盘相关问题并实现初步轴向稳定性。然而,它们的特点是发病率高。另外,理论上具有优势的使用自体骨移植的后路TLIF技术在临床上失败了,因为它缺乏压缩稳定性。
对36只绵羊的腰椎L4至L6进行后路器械固定。在内镜辅助下进行L4至L5的TLIF。在12只绵羊中,缺损处用可注射的HA-OP-1填充。另外12只绵羊用HA治疗,另外12只用自体骨移植治疗。在8周时处死动物,并通过放射学、组织学和组织形态计量学分析以及荧光素标记进行评估。
只有10只自体骨移植绵羊可供评估。在放射学和组织学上,与自体骨移植(10只中有1只融合)和HA(12只中有2只融合)相比,使用HA-OP-1的TLIF融合率为12只中有10只融合(P = 0.0016)。半定量放射学和组织学评分也显示出显著差异,HA-OP-1具有优越性(P = 0.0011)。与HA相比,HA-OP-1在骨水泥界面处的骨化明显更多(P = 0.0003),骨水泥吸收更少(P = 0.0209)。在12只HA绵羊中有4只,过度吸收导致局部无菌性炎症。
骨传导性HA的生物整合未发生,因为剪切力导致早期HA骨折、随后的碎裂和大量吸收(在12只绵羊中有4只引发严重炎症)。相比之下,HA-OP-1的骨诱导作用实现了生物整合,导致完全的骨复合材料包绕和牢固融合。通过使用这种复合材料,TLIF在绵羊中成功应用。避免了自体骨移植的获取和前路手术。