Patel Hema, Platt Robert W, Pekeles Gary S, Ducharme Francine M
Department of Pediatrics, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
J Pediatr. 2002 Dec;141(6):818-24. doi: 10.1067/mpd.2002.129844.
In previously well infants hospitalized with acute viral bronchiolitis, the effectiveness of repeated nebulized therapy with epinephrine (EPI) was compared with treatment with albuterol (ALB) or saline placebo (PLAC).
In this randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, controlled trial, infants received study nebulizations every 1 to 6 hours and were assessed twice daily by the research team. The primary outcome was length of hospital stay (LOS). Secondary outcomes included the time from admission until the infant had normal hydration, oxygenation, and minimal respiratory distress.
A total of 149 infants were randomized; 50 were allocated to receive racemic EPI, 51 were given ALB, and 48 received PLAC. Baseline characteristics and pre-enrollment symptoms, signs, and therapy were similar between groups. There were no group differences in the primary outcome measure, mean LOS (hours)(+/- SD): EPI = 59.8 (62), ALB = 61.4 (54), and PLAC = 63.3 (47); P =.95 by intent-to-treat analysis. Group differences were not statistically significant in any of the secondary outcomes.
There were no group differences in the effectiveness of therapy for infants hospitalized with bronchiolitis. Based on these results, we do not recommend routine use of either nebulized EPI or ALB in this patient group.
在先前健康的因急性病毒性细支气管炎住院的婴儿中,比较肾上腺素(EPI)重复雾化治疗与沙丁胺醇(ALB)或生理盐水安慰剂(PLAC)治疗的效果。
在这项随机、双盲、平行组对照试验中,婴儿每1至6小时接受一次研究性雾化治疗,研究团队每天对其进行两次评估。主要结局是住院时间(LOS)。次要结局包括从入院到婴儿水合、氧合正常且呼吸窘迫最小化的时间。
共有149名婴儿被随机分组;50名被分配接受消旋EPI,51名给予ALB,48名接受PLAC。各组间的基线特征以及入组前的症状、体征和治疗情况相似。主要结局指标平均住院时间(小时)(±标准差)无组间差异:EPI = 59.8(62),ALB = 61.4(54),PLAC = 63.3(47);意向性分析的P值为0.95。在任何次要结局中,组间差异均无统计学意义。
对于因细支气管炎住院的婴儿,治疗效果无组间差异。基于这些结果,我们不建议在该患者群体中常规使用雾化EPI或ALB。