• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Initial validation of a questionnaire for detecting gastroesophageal reflux disease in epidemiological settings.

作者信息

Manterola Carlos, Muñoz Sergio, Grande Luis, Bustos Luis

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Universidad de La Frontera, Casilla 54-D, Temuco, Chile.

出版信息

J Clin Epidemiol. 2002 Oct;55(10):1041-5. doi: 10.1016/s0895-4356(02)00454-7.

DOI:10.1016/s0895-4356(02)00454-7
PMID:12464381
Abstract

There is a high prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) in the general population. Prevalence studies are scarce, and there is a lack of valid instruments for measuring them. The aim of this paper is to validate a questionnaire for detecting GERD. A validity study design with pathologic GERD patients and controls was used. A sample of 240 subjects age and sex paired was selected in the ratio of 3:1 (patients to controls). The initial structured questionnaire contained a variety of GERD symptoms. Internal consistency, interobserver reliability, criteria validity using 24-h esophageal pH monitoring, construct validity, and extreme group validation were assessed. Sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values were also obtained in different cutoff points of the definitive scale. A total of 180 confirmed GERD patients and 60 controls were included in the study. Mean age in years was 45 +/- 13, with no statistical difference by gender (67% were female). Internal consistency of 0.75 and interobserver reliability of 0.87 was achieved in building the scale. Extreme group validation was highly significant by assessing the scale score with 24-h esophageal pH monitoring (P <.0001). At cutoff point 3 of the scale and with a correct classification of subjects of 92.4%, sensitivity, specificity, positive, and negative predictive values were 92, 95, 98, and 79%, respectively. The conclusion of this article is that a reliable and valid instrument was built to detect GERD.

摘要

相似文献

1
Initial validation of a questionnaire for detecting gastroesophageal reflux disease in epidemiological settings.
J Clin Epidemiol. 2002 Oct;55(10):1041-5. doi: 10.1016/s0895-4356(02)00454-7.
2
[Construction and validation of a gastroesophageal reflux symptom scale. Preliminary report].[胃食管反流症状量表的构建与验证。初步报告]
Rev Med Chil. 1999 Oct;127(10):1213-22.
3
Composite score of reflux symptoms in diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease.反流症状综合评分在胃食管反流病诊断中的应用
World J Gastroenterol. 2004 Nov 15;10(22):3332-5. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v10.i22.3332.
4
[Diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease-related noncardiac chest pain].[胃食管反流病相关非心源性胸痛的诊断]
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2008 May 27;88(20):1390-3.
5
Reflux symptoms in 100 normal infants: diagnostic validity of the infant gastroesophageal reflux questionnaire.100名正常婴儿的反流症状:婴儿胃食管反流问卷的诊断效度
Clin Pediatr (Phila). 1996 Dec;35(12):607-14. doi: 10.1177/000992289603501201.
6
Psychometric and methodological characteristics of a culturally adjusted gastroesophageal reflux disease questionnaire.一份经过文化调适的胃食管反流病问卷的心理测量学和方法学特征
Dis Esophagus. 2004;17(3):228-34. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2050.2004.00413.x.
7
[Diagnostic usefulness of the Carlsson-Dent questionnaire in gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD)].卡尔森-登特问卷在胃食管反流病(GERD)中的诊断效用
Rev Gastroenterol Mex. 2004 Jan-Mar;69(1):16-23.
8
Systematic review of patient-reported outcome instruments for gastroesophageal reflux disease symptoms.胃食管反流病症状患者报告结局测评工具的系统评价。
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013 Jan;25(1):2-14. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0b013e328358bf74.
9
Validation of the GSFQ, a self-administered symptom frequency questionnaire for patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease.胃食管反流病患者自我管理症状频率问卷(GSFQ)的验证
Can J Gastroenterol. 2003 May;17(5):307-12. doi: 10.1155/2003/530984.
10
The Validity and Reliability Test of the Indonesian Version of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Quality of Life (GERD-QOL) Questionnaire.印度尼西亚版胃食管反流病生活质量(GERD-QOL)问卷的效度和信度测试。
Acta Med Indones. 2017 Jan;49(1):3-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Epidemiology of gastroesophageal reflux disease in Iran: a systematic review and meta-analysis.伊朗胃食管反流病的流行病学:一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
BMC Gastroenterol. 2020 Sep 14;20(1):297. doi: 10.1186/s12876-020-01417-6.
2
Prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux disease: a population-based cross-sectional study in southern Chile.胃食管反流病的患病率:智利南部一项基于人群的横断面研究
Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf). 2020 Feb 19;8(4):286-292. doi: 10.1093/gastro/goaa002. eCollection 2020 Aug.
3
Evaluation of Gastroesophageal Reflux in Children Born With Esophageal Atresia Using pH and Impedance Monitoring.
使用 pH 值和阻抗监测评估先天性食管闭锁患儿的胃食管反流。
J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2019 Nov;69(5):515-522. doi: 10.1097/MPG.0000000000002468.
4
Prevalence and Correlates of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease in Southern Iran: Pars Cohort Study.伊朗南部胃食管反流病的患病率及其相关因素:帕尔斯队列研究
Middle East J Dig Dis. 2017 Jul;9(3):129-138. doi: 10.15171/mejdd.2017.63.
5
Association between circulating levels of sex steroid hormones and Barrett's esophagus in men: a case-control analysis.男性循环性甾体激素水平与巴雷特食管之间的关联:一项病例对照分析。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015 Apr;13(4):673-82. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2014.08.027. Epub 2014 Aug 24.
6
Global changes in gene expression of Barrett's esophagus compared to normal squamous esophagus and gastric cardia tissues.与正常鳞状食管和贲门组织相比,巴雷特食管基因表达的整体变化。
PLoS One. 2014 Apr 8;9(4):e93219. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0093219. eCollection 2014.
7
Metabolic syndrome increases risk of Barrett esophagus in the absence of gastroesophageal reflux: an analysis of SEER-Medicare Data.在无胃食管反流的情况下,代谢综合征会增加巴雷特食管的风险:一项基于监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)-医疗保险数据的分析
J Clin Gastroenterol. 2015 Apr;49(4):282-8. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000000119.
8
Categorization of upper gastrointestinal symptoms is useful in predicting background factors and studying effects and usages of digestive drugs.上消化道症状的分类有助于预测背景因素以及研究消化药物的作用和用途。
PLoS One. 2014 Feb 5;9(2):e88277. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0088277. eCollection 2014.
9
The Diagnostic Significance of Coapplying a Rabeprazole Test with the SF-36 for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease.联合应用雷贝拉唑试验和 SF-36 对胃食管反流病的诊断意义。
Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2013;2013:419375. doi: 10.1155/2013/419375. Epub 2013 Feb 28.
10
Comparison of gastroesophageal reflux disease symptoms and proton pump inhibitor response using gastroesophageal reflux disease impact scale questionnaire.采用胃食管反流病影响量表问卷比较胃食管反流病症状和质子泵抑制剂反应。
J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2013 Jan;19(1):61-9. doi: 10.5056/jnm.2013.19.1.61. Epub 2013 Jan 8.