Barker Piers C A, Ensing Gregory, Ludomirsky Achiau, Bradley David J, Lloyd Thomas R, Rocchini Albert P
University of Michigan Congenital Heart Center, Ann Arbor 48109, USA.
J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2002 Dec;15(12):1496-502. doi: 10.1067/mje.2002.126415.
Congenital aortic valve stenosis is a common problem in pediatric cardiology. The catheter peak to peak systolic gradient is the accepted standard used for prognosis and intervention, but noninvasive correlation in pediatric patients is frequently associated with underestimation or overestimation of this gradient. The purpose of this study was to compare different noninvasive measurements with simultaneous catheter gradients to identify which best predicts the catheter peak to peak gradient.
Twenty-five simultaneous Doppler and catheter measurements of aortic stenosis gradient were performed in 14 children (all 14 before valvuloplasty and 11 after valvuloplasty). Noninvasive estimates of pressure gradient were compared with catheter measurements with linear regression and Bland-Altman analysis.
The Doppler peak instantaneous pressure gradient overestimated the catheter peak to peak gradient but correlated well with the catheter peak instantaneous gradient. The Doppler mean systolic gradient correlated well with the catheter peak to peak gradient at low gradients and underestimated higher catheter gradients but agreed well at all levels with the catheter mean gradient. The modification of a catheter-derived correlation equation produced good correlation with the catheter peak to peak gradient (slope, 1.14; intercept, -1.8; R, 0.92), as did the use of estimated pressure recovery (slope, 1.04; intercept, 5.0; R, 0.94), calculated from a defined fluid mechanic equation.
The catheter peak to peak gradient can be accurately estimated noninvasively using estimated pressure recovery or correlation equations incorporating Doppler measurements.
先天性主动脉瓣狭窄是小儿心脏病学中的常见问题。导管测量的收缩期峰峰值压差是用于预后评估和干预的公认标准,但小儿患者的无创性测量结果与该压差之间的相关性常常存在低估或高估的情况。本研究的目的是比较不同的无创性测量方法与同步导管测量压差,以确定哪种方法能最佳预测导管测量的峰峰值压差。
对14名儿童进行了25次主动脉狭窄压差的同步多普勒和导管测量(14名均在瓣膜成形术前,11名在瓣膜成形术后)。通过线性回归和Bland-Altman分析,将压差的无创性估计值与导管测量值进行比较。
多普勒测量的峰值瞬时压差高估了导管测量的峰峰值压差,但与导管测量的峰值瞬时压差相关性良好。在低压差时,多普勒平均收缩期压差与导管测量的峰峰值压差相关性良好,而在高压差时则低估了导管测量的压差,但在所有水平上与导管测量的平均压差一致性良好。对导管衍生的相关方程进行修正后,与导管测量的峰峰值压差具有良好的相关性(斜率为1.14;截距为-1.8;R为0.92),根据定义的流体力学方程计算的压力恢复估计值(斜率为1.04;截距为5.0;R为0.94)也具有良好的相关性。
使用压力恢复估计值或结合多普勒测量的相关方程,可以无创准确地估计导管测量的峰峰值压差。