Vlahos Antonios P, Marx Gerald R, McElhinney Doff, Oneill Stephen, Goudevenos Ioannis, Colan Steven D
Child Health Department, Pediatric Cardiology Division, University of Ioannina, 45110 Ioannina, Greece.
Pediatr Cardiol. 2008 May;29(3):507-14. doi: 10.1007/s00246-007-9169-9. Epub 2007 Dec 14.
The optimal echocardiographic methodology for predicting need for intervention in children with valvar aortic stenosis (VAS) is not known. We reviewed echocardiograms and catheterization reports of 79 children (aged 9.5 +/- 5.9 years) with isolated VAS. The maximum and mean Doppler-predicted gradients from the apical (MIGAP), MEGAP)) and the suprasternal or right parasternal (MIGHP), MEGHP)) windows were measured. The peak-to-peak catheterization gradient and the intervention (if any) were recorded. All sites and methods of Doppler estimation of VAS gradient correlated in a linear fashion with the invasive gradient (R2 = 0.34-0.50) and with one another (R2 = 0.48-0.86). MIGAP and MIGHP overestimated the invasive gradient in 60% and 86% of patients, whereas MEGAP and MEGHP underestimated the invasive gradient in 94% and 83% of patients, respectively. Age and diameter of the ascending aorta had small but significant effects on the level of agreement. A MIGHP < or = 55 mm Hg predicted no intervention with 100% accuracy, whereas the specificities of a MIGHP > 90 mm Hg, a MEGAP > 50 mm Hg, and a (MIGAP + MIGHP)/2 > 70 mm Hg for intervention were 94%, 100%, and 92%, respectively. The magnitude of overestimation was significantly lower from the apical window. In children with VAS, the best prediction of the catheterization gradient could be based on the average of MIGAP and MIGHP.
预测小儿瓣膜性主动脉狭窄(VAS)干预需求的最佳超声心动图方法尚不清楚。我们回顾了79例孤立性VAS患儿(年龄9.5±5.9岁)的超声心动图和心导管检查报告。测量了来自心尖(MIGAP、MEGAP)以及胸骨上或右胸骨旁(MIGHP、MEGHP)窗口的最大和平均多普勒预测梯度。记录心导管检查的峰-峰梯度和干预情况(如有)。所有VAS梯度的多普勒估计部位和方法与侵入性梯度呈线性相关(R2 = 0.34 - 0.50),且相互之间也呈线性相关(R2 = 0.48 - 0.86)。MIGAP和MIGHP分别在60%和86%的患者中高估了侵入性梯度,而MEGAP和MEGHP分别在94%和83%的患者中低估了侵入性梯度。年龄和升主动脉直径对一致性水平有微小但显著的影响。MIGHP≤55 mmHg预测无需干预的准确率为100%,而MIGHP>90 mmHg、MEGAP>50 mmHg以及(MIGAP + MIGHP)/2>70 mmHg对干预的特异性分别为94%、100%和92%。心尖窗口的高估幅度明显更低。在患有VAS的儿童中,对心导管检查梯度的最佳预测可基于MIGAP和MIGHP的平均值。