Villavicencio R E, Forbes T J, Thomas R L, Humes R A
Department of Pediatrics, Division of Cardiology, Wayne State University School of Medicine/Detroit Medical Center and Children's Hospital of Michigan, 3901 Beaubien Avenue, Detroit, MI 48201, USA.
Pediatr Cardiol. 2003 Sep-Oct;24(5):457-62. doi: 10.1007/s00246-002-0361-7.
This study was designed to evaluate the phenomenon of pressure recovery in pediatric patients with aortic stenosis and also to evaluate how observed differences between catheter and Doppler gradients can be predicted by Doppler echocardiography. Doppler measurements of aortic valve stenosis gradients are known to overestimate observed gradients in the catheterization laboratory. Pressure recovery has been shown to be a contributing factor to this discrepancy. However, the clinical relevance of correcting Doppler gradients using the pressure recovery equation has not been evaluated in the pediatric population. Simultaneously obtained catheter and Doppler gradients were studied in 14 patients (range, 0.03-18 years; mean, 4.1 years) with aortic valve stenosis. A total of 23 data points were measured because 9 patients underwent balloon valvuloplasty and had both a pre- and a post-balloon valvuloplasty data point in the study. The catheter gradients were then compared to peak, mean, and pressure recovery corrected Doppler gradients. Pressure recovery was calculated using a previously validated equation. As expected, measured echocardiographic continuous-wave peak Doppler gradients overestimated the observed catheter gradients (range, 16-93 mmHg; mean, 43 mmHg). The continuous-wave peak Doppler gradients, mean, and pressure recovery adjusted gradients were equally as good in correlating the observed catheter gradients to those obtained by Doppler echocardiography (r = 0.92). However, pressure recovery corrected Doppler gradients were in better agreement with catheter gradients than echocardiographic mean or peak Doppler gradients (95% limit of agreement: -9 to 19 mmHg for pressure recovery corrected gradients, -30 to 11 mmHg for mean Doppler gradients, and 2-83 mmHg for peak Doppler gradients). Measured continuous-wave peak Doppler gradients consistently overestimated catheter gradients. The noted differences may be predicted using the pressure recovery equation. Pressure recovery is a significant factor in children with aortic valve stenosis.
本研究旨在评估主动脉瓣狭窄小儿患者的压力恢复现象,并评估如何通过多普勒超声心动图预测导管测量梯度与多普勒梯度之间的观察差异。已知在导管实验室中,主动脉瓣狭窄梯度的多普勒测量会高估观察到的梯度。压力恢复已被证明是导致这种差异的一个因素。然而,在儿科人群中,使用压力恢复方程校正多普勒梯度的临床相关性尚未得到评估。对14例(年龄范围0.03 - 18岁;平均4.1岁)主动脉瓣狭窄患者同时进行了导管测量梯度和多普勒测量梯度的研究。由于9例患者接受了球囊瓣膜成形术,且在研究中有球囊瓣膜成形术前和术后的数据点,因此共测量了23个数据点。然后将导管梯度与峰值、平均以及压力恢复校正后的多普勒梯度进行比较。使用先前验证的方程计算压力恢复。正如预期的那样,测量的超声心动图连续波峰值多普勒梯度高估了观察到的导管梯度(范围为16 - 93 mmHg;平均为43 mmHg)。连续波峰值多普勒梯度、平均梯度以及压力恢复调整后的梯度在将观察到的导管梯度与通过多普勒超声心动图获得的梯度进行关联方面同样良好(r = 0.92)。然而,压力恢复校正后的多普勒梯度与导管梯度的一致性优于超声心动图平均或峰值多普勒梯度(压力恢复校正梯度的95%一致性界限为 -9至19 mmHg,平均多普勒梯度为 -30至11 mmHg,峰值多普勒梯度为2至83 mmHg)。测量的连续波峰值多普勒梯度始终高估导管梯度。使用压力恢复方程可以预测所观察到的差异。压力恢复是主动脉瓣狭窄儿童的一个重要因素。