• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

改进健康计划与医疗服务提供者之间交换与乳房X光检查相关的绩效数据的流程。

Improving the process through which health plans and providers exchange performance-related mammography data.

作者信息

Fairbrother Gerry, Luciano James, Park Heidi L

机构信息

Division of Health and Science Policy, New York Academy of Medicine, New York, NY 10029-5293, USA.

出版信息

J Urban Health. 2002 Dec;79(4):617-27; discussion 628-37. doi: 10.1093/jurban/79.4.617.

DOI:10.1093/jurban/79.4.617
PMID:12468680
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3456715/
Abstract

The ability of health plans to bring about quality improvement is limited by the fact that physician networks are highly differentiated, with physician groups participating in many plans and plans contracting with many physician groups. The primary purpose of our study was to investigate the problems in the current system of quality monitoring by managed-care organizations (MCOs) at a large integrated health care delivery system (Montefiore Medical Center) and to develop ways of addressing these problems through collaboration among MCOs. The project began by mapping the current system for collecting, reporting, and using performance data to improve performance, using breast cancer screening as an example. We found that neither health plans nor providers were satisfied with the current system. From the perspective of the health plans, the current quality monitoring was costly and, more important, was not yielding appreciable increases in screening rates. From the providers' perspective, multiple health plan requests for chart pulls and other data collection activities cost them substantial amounts of time and money and generated multiple mailings of educational materials and reports, but rarely supplied meaningful information about their performance. From the perspective of the hospital, the current procedure of reporting from MCO to provider or center bypassed the institution's own quality monitoring and management structure and thus limited the institution's ability to assist in quality improvement. This study clearly showed the importance of collaboration among plans at a given provider site. Specifically, it pointed to the need for provider-oriented reporting of data, rather than plan-oriented reporting, to give physicians numbers that they believe. It also showed the need to engage the institution's own quality-management system to assist in bringing about improvements.

摘要

健康计划实现质量改进的能力受到限制,原因在于医师网络高度分化,医师团队参与多个计划,而计划也与多个医师团队签约。我们研究的主要目的是调查大型综合医疗服务提供系统(蒙特菲奥里医疗中心)中管理式医疗组织(MCO)当前的质量监测系统存在的问题,并通过MCO之间的合作来制定解决这些问题的方法。该项目首先以乳腺癌筛查为例,绘制了当前收集、报告和使用绩效数据以改进绩效的系统。我们发现,健康计划和提供者都对当前系统不满意。从健康计划的角度来看,当前的质量监测成本高昂,更重要的是,筛查率并未显著提高。从提供者的角度来看,多个健康计划要求提取病历和进行其他数据收集活动,耗费了他们大量的时间和金钱,还产生了多份教育材料和报告的邮寄,但很少提供有关他们绩效的有意义信息。从医院的角度来看,MCO向提供者或中心报告的当前程序绕过了机构自身的质量监测和管理结构,从而限制了机构协助质量改进的能力。这项研究清楚地表明了在给定提供者地点各计划之间合作的重要性。具体而言,它指出需要以提供者为导向进行数据报告,而不是以计划为导向,以便为医生提供他们认可的数据。它还表明需要让机构自身的质量管理系统参与进来以协助实现改进。

相似文献

1
Improving the process through which health plans and providers exchange performance-related mammography data.改进健康计划与医疗服务提供者之间交换与乳房X光检查相关的绩效数据的流程。
J Urban Health. 2002 Dec;79(4):617-27; discussion 628-37. doi: 10.1093/jurban/79.4.617.
2
Problems with quality monitoring for Medicaid managed care: perceptions of institutional and private providers in New York City.医疗补助管理式医疗的质量监测问题:纽约市机构和私立医疗服务提供者的看法
J Urban Health. 2000 Dec;77(4):573-91. doi: 10.1007/BF02344024.
3
Creating value-focused healthcare delivery systems: Part three--Core competencies.创建以价值为导向的医疗服务体系:第三部分——核心竞争力。
J Oncol Manag. 1997 Nov-Dec;6(6):16-23.
4
A process for developing community consensus regarding the diagnosis and management of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.一个就注意力缺陷/多动障碍的诊断和管理达成社区共识的过程。
Pediatrics. 2005 Jan;115(1):e97-104. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-0953.
5
Quality improvement in a managed care organization from a medical director's perspective: an interview with Bruce Perry. Interview by Douglas Roblin.从医疗主任视角看管理式医疗组织中的质量改进:对布鲁斯·佩里的访谈。道格拉斯·罗布林访谈
Jt Comm J Qual Improv. 2000 Oct;26(10):601-10.
6
Quality monitoring and management in commercial health plans.商业健康保险计划中的质量监测与管理
Am J Manag Care. 2008 Jun;14(6):377-86.
7
Operationalizing MTM through the use of health information technology.通过使用健康信息技术将药物治疗管理付诸实践。
J Manag Care Pharm. 2008 Mar;14(2 Suppl):S18-21.
8
Implementing and using quality measures for children's health care: perspectives on the state of the practice.实施和使用儿童保健质量指标:实践现状透视
Pediatrics. 2004 Jan;113(1 Pt 2):217-27.
9
Comparison of administrative-only versus administrative plus chart review data for reporting HEDIS hybrid measures.用于报告健康保健效果数据和信息集(HEDIS)混合指标的仅行政数据与行政加图表审查数据的比较。
Am J Manag Care. 2007 Oct;13(10):553-8.
10
The association between quality improvement activities performed by managed care organizations and quality of care.管理式医疗组织开展的质量改进活动与医疗质量之间的关联。
Am J Med. 2004 Sep 1;117(5):297-304. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2004.02.046.

引用本文的文献

1
Health care practices of the foreign born Asian Indians in the United States. A community based survey.美国出生的亚裔印度人的医疗保健实践。一项基于社区的调查。
J Community Health. 2012 Apr;37(2):328-34. doi: 10.1007/s10900-011-9449-4.

本文引用的文献

1
Why is there a quality chasm?为什么会存在质量鸿沟?
Health Aff (Millwood). 2002 Jul-Aug;21(4):13-25. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.21.4.13.
2
Professionalism, regulation, and the market: impact on accountability for quality of care.
Health Aff (Millwood). 2002 May-Jun;21(3):200-7. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.21.3.200.
3
Quality information and consumer health plan choices.质量信息与消费者健康计划选择。
J Health Econ. 2002 Jan;21(1):43-63. doi: 10.1016/s0167-6296(01)00126-6.
4
The quality performance matrix: New York State's model for targeting quality improvement in managed care plans.质量绩效矩阵:纽约州管理式医疗计划中针对质量改进的模式。
Qual Manag Health Care. 2002 Winter;10(2):39-46. doi: 10.1097/00019514-200210020-00008.
5
A "best practices" strategy to improve quality in Medicaid managed care plans.一项旨在提高医疗补助管理式医疗计划质量的“最佳实践”策略。
J Urban Health. 2000 Dec;77(4):592-602. doi: 10.1007/BF02344025.
6
Problems with quality monitoring for Medicaid managed care: perceptions of institutional and private providers in New York City.医疗补助管理式医疗的质量监测问题:纽约市机构和私立医疗服务提供者的看法
J Urban Health. 2000 Dec;77(4):573-91. doi: 10.1007/BF02344024.
7
Are managed care plans organizing for quality?管理式医疗计划是否在为提高质量而进行组织?
Med Care Res Rev. 2000;57 Suppl 2:9-32. doi: 10.1177/1077558700057002S02.
8
Alternative explanations for poor report card performance.成绩单表现不佳的其他解释。
Eff Clin Pract. 2000 Jan-Feb;3(1):25-30.
9
The evolution of NCQA accreditation.国家质量保证委员会(NCQA)认证的发展历程。
Healthplan. 1999 Mar-Apr;40(2):19-23.
10
Value-based formulas for purchasing. Employers shift to quality to evaluate and manage their health plans.基于价值的采购公式。雇主转向以质量来评估和管理他们的健康计划。
Manag Care Q. 1997 Winter;5(1):51-6.