Cardoso Paulo Eduardo Capel, Placido Eliane, Moura Sandra Kiss
Department of Dental Materials, School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Am J Dent. 2002 Jun;15(3):164-8.
To evaluate microleakage at the dentin margins of Class II resin-based composite restorations using four simplified adhesive systems: Etch & Prime 3.0, Prime & Bond NT, Clearfil Liner Bond 2V and Clearfil SE Bond, upon thermal and mechanical stresses.
Forty slot preparations (5mm x 3mm x 1.5mm) were cut in sound human molars with gingival margins below the cement/enamel junction. All adhesive systems were applied strictly according to manufacturers' instructions. Cavities were restored using Clearfil AP-X composite resin. After finishing and polishing, teeth were submitted to thermal (x700, 5-55 degrees C, 60-second dwell time) and consecutively mechanical cycling (100,000 cycle; 8 Kgf load). Specimens were coated with nail polish, immersed in silver nitrate for 2 hours and sectioned longitudinally with a diamond disc. The extent of leakage was ranked using a 0-4 scale.
Statistical analysis was performed using Kruskal-Wallis test. Minimal leakage occurred with Clearfil SE Bond. There was a statistically significant difference (P<0.01) between this system and Clearfil Liner Bond 2V, although the latter also showed low values of dye penetration. No statistically significant difference was found between Etch & Prime 3.0 and Prime & Bond NT. Both showed statistically greater leakage than the two other systems (P<0.01).