Easmon C S, Glynn A A
Immunology. 1975 Jul;29(1):67-74.
Mice were protected against the dermonecrotic effects of Staphylococcus aureus by previous infection with either coagulase-positive or coagulase-negative strains or by immunization with alpha-toxin. Passive protection was conferred by serum from previously infected mice or by alpha-antitoxin. While only some of these methods were associated with circulating alpha-antitoxin, in all cases there was a brisk early inflammatory response to infection. Furthermore, if the capacity of well immunized mice to mount such a response was removed, they were no longer protected against dermonecrosis. Conversely, non-immune mice developed little or no necrosis if the staphylococci were injected into areas of preexisting non-specific acute inflammation whether these had been produced chemically or immunologically. It is suggested that in this model of local infection with S. aureus an early inflammatory response, however provoked, is the major protective factor. Though specific neutralizing actions of antibodies are not excluded, the most important result of antibody-antigen reaction is to cause local inflammation by some form of immediate hyersensitivity.
通过先前感染凝固酶阳性或凝固酶阴性菌株或用α毒素免疫,可使小鼠免受金黄色葡萄球菌的皮肤坏死作用。先前感染小鼠的血清或α抗毒素可提供被动保护。虽然这些方法中只有一些与循环α抗毒素有关,但在所有情况下,对感染都有迅速的早期炎症反应。此外,如果消除了免疫良好的小鼠产生这种反应的能力,它们就不再受到皮肤坏死的保护。相反,如果将葡萄球菌注射到预先存在的非特异性急性炎症区域,无论这些炎症是化学性还是免疫性产生的,非免疫小鼠几乎不会发生坏死或根本不发生坏死。有人认为,在这种金黄色葡萄球菌局部感染模型中,无论如何引发,早期炎症反应都是主要的保护因素。虽然不排除抗体的特异性中和作用,但抗体 - 抗原反应的最重要结果是以某种形式的速发型超敏反应引起局部炎症。