• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

患有结构异常胎儿的分娩途径。

Route of delivery of fetuses with structural anomalies.

作者信息

Anteby Eyal Y, Yagel Simcha

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hadassah University Hospital, P.O. Box 24035, Mt. Scopus, Jerusalem, Israel.

出版信息

Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2003 Jan 10;106(1):5-9. doi: 10.1016/s0301-2115(02)00033-7.

DOI:10.1016/s0301-2115(02)00033-7
PMID:12475573
Abstract

Our ability to diagnose fetuses with congenital anomalies has dramatically increased over the past two decades and with improved surgical treatment for some defects, more women may choose to continue their pregnancies. Antenatal management is thus of increasing relevance. The literature on route of delivery suggests the following conclusions. Babies with neural tube defects presenting by the breech benefit from caesarean section but there is no clear evidence that cesarean improves outcome in those with a vertex presentation. When the size of the sac exceeds 6 cm, cesarean section may be justified to decrease the risk of disruption. Vaginal delivery is desirable in all other cases to reduce maternal morbidity. Cystic hygroma: cesarean section offers optimal conditions for management of large anterior lymphangiomas that can obstruct the airway. Sacrococcygeal teratoma: the current approach is based on the size of the tumor. In a fetus with a tumor of less than 5 cm, vaginal delivery may be attempted. Ventral wall defects: there is no conclusive evidence that cesarean section is beneficial for fetuses with omphalocele. Gastroschisis: because of the heterogeneity of the studies, it is difficult to assess the net impact of mode of delivery. There is no evidence of significant differences in outcome among fetuses delivered by the vaginal versus the abdominal route. Trauma to the abdominal viscera can occur during either route, and careful delivery is thus mandated.

摘要

在过去二十年中,我们诊断先天性异常胎儿的能力显著提高,并且随着一些缺陷的外科治疗方法得到改进,更多的女性可能会选择继续妊娠。因此,产前管理的相关性日益增加。关于分娩方式的文献表明了以下结论。臀位分娩的神经管缺陷婴儿可从剖宫产中获益,但没有明确证据表明剖宫产能改善头位分娩婴儿的结局。当囊肿大小超过6厘米时,剖宫产可能是合理的,以降低破裂风险。在所有其他情况下,阴道分娩是可取的,以降低产妇发病率。颈部水囊瘤:剖宫产为处理可能阻塞气道的大型前淋巴管瘤提供了最佳条件。骶尾部畸胎瘤:目前的方法是基于肿瘤的大小。对于肿瘤小于5厘米的胎儿,可尝试阴道分娩。腹壁缺损:没有确凿证据表明剖宫产对脐膨出胎儿有益。腹裂:由于研究的异质性,很难评估分娩方式的净影响。没有证据表明经阴道分娩与经腹分娩的胎儿结局存在显著差异。两种分娩途径都可能发生腹部脏器损伤,因此必须谨慎分娩。

相似文献

1
Route of delivery of fetuses with structural anomalies.患有结构异常胎儿的分娩途径。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2003 Jan 10;106(1):5-9. doi: 10.1016/s0301-2115(02)00033-7.
2
Is vaginal delivery preferable to elective cesarean delivery in fetuses with a known ventral wall defect?对于已知存在腹壁缺损的胎儿,经阴道分娩是否优于选择性剖宫产?
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000 Jun;182(6):1527-34. doi: 10.1067/mob.2000.106852.
3
Optimal delivery for preterm breech fetuses: is there any consensus?对于早产儿臀位胎儿,最佳分娩方式:是否存在共识?
Hong Kong Med J. 2013 Jun;19(3):251-7. doi: 10.12809/hkmj133963. Epub 2013 Apr 22.
4
Neonatal outcomes in fetuses with cardiac anomalies and the impact of delivery route.患有心脏异常的胎儿的新生儿结局及分娩方式的影响。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Oct;217(4):469.e1-469.e12. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.05.049. Epub 2017 May 31.
5
Perinatal Management of Pregnancies with Fetal Congenital Anomalies: A Guide to Obstetricians and Pediatricians.胎儿先天畸形妊娠的围产期管理:妇产科医生和儿科医生指南。
Curr Pediatr Rev. 2024;20(2):150-165. doi: 10.2174/1573396318666221005142001.
6
Evaluation of a protocol for selecting fetuses in breech presentation for vaginal delivery or cesarean section.评估臀位胎儿经阴道分娩或剖宫产选择方案。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1997 Sep;177(3):586-92. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(97)70150-9.
7
Omphalocele delivery enigma: the best mode of delivery still remains dubious.脐膨出分娩之谜:最佳分娩方式仍不确定。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1999 Jan;82(1):19-22. doi: 10.1016/s0301-2115(98)00170-5.
8
Maternal and neonatal outcomes of attempted vaginal compared with planned cesarean delivery in triplet gestations.三胎妊娠中尝试经阴道分娩与计划剖宫产的母婴结局比较。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Oct;215(4):493.e1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.04.054. Epub 2016 May 7.
9
Gastroschisis and omphalocele: does either antenatal diagnosis or route of delivery make a difference in perinatal outcome?腹裂和脐膨出:产前诊断或分娩方式会对围产期结局产生影响吗?
Obstet Gynecol. 1990 Aug;76(2):195-9.
10
Route of delivery of infants with congenital anomalies.先天性异常婴儿的分娩途径。
Clin Perinatol. 1993 Mar;20(1):81-106.

引用本文的文献

1
Sacrococcygeal Teratoma : A Tumor at the Center of Embryogenesis.骶尾部畸胎瘤:胚胎发生中心的肿瘤。
J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2021 May;64(3):406-413. doi: 10.3340/jkns.2021.0015. Epub 2021 Apr 29.
2
Prevalence and pattern of birth defects in the two tertiary hospitals in Enugu, South East Nigeria: A hospital-based observational study.尼日利亚东南部埃努古的两家三级医院的出生缺陷发生率和类型:一项基于医院的观察性研究。
Afr J Paediatr Surg. 2020 Jul-Dec;17(3 & 4):85-89. doi: 10.4103/ajps.AJPS_59_20.
3
Risk factors for adverse outcomes in vaginal preterm breech labor.
阴道早产臀位分娩不良结局的危险因素。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2021 Jan;303(1):93-101. doi: 10.1007/s00404-020-05731-y. Epub 2020 Aug 7.
4
Just choice: a Danielsian analysis of the aims and scope of prenatal screening for fetal abnormalities.正义的抉择:对胎儿异常产前筛查的目的与范围的丹尼尔斯式分析
Med Health Care Philos. 2019 Dec;22(4):545-555. doi: 10.1007/s11019-019-09888-5.
5
Outcomes in infants with prenatally diagnosed gastroschisis and planned preterm delivery.产前诊断为腹裂并计划早产的婴儿的结局
Pediatr Surg Int. 2015 Nov;31(11):1047-53. doi: 10.1007/s00383-015-3795-8. Epub 2015 Sep 23.
6
A meningomyelocele with normal intracranial signs on ultrasound and false-negative amniotic fluid alpha-fetoprotein and acetylcholinesterase.超声检查显示颅内征象正常的脊髓脊膜膨出,羊水甲胎蛋白和乙酰胆碱酯酶检测呈假阴性。
Obstet Gynecol Sci. 2014 May;57(3):223-7. doi: 10.5468/ogs.2014.57.3.223. Epub 2014 May 15.
7
Sacrococcygeal teratoma in Northeastern Nigeria: 18-years experience.尼日利亚东北部的骶尾部畸胎瘤:18年经验
Pediatr Surg Int. 2005 Aug;21(8):645-8. doi: 10.1007/s00383-005-1486-6. Epub 2005 Oct 13.