Neto Miguel Moyses, da Costa José Abrão Cardeal, Garcia-Cairasco Norberto, Netto Joaquim Coutinho, Nakagawa Beatriz, Dantas Marcio
Nephrology Division of Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine of Ribeirao Preto, University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2003 Jan;18(1):120-5. doi: 10.1093/ndt/18.1.120.
Clinical symptoms and outcomes of uraemic patients ingesting star fruit are quite variable and may progress to death. The purpose of the present report was to discuss the neurotoxic effects of star fruit intoxication in uraemic patients and to present the efficacy of different therapeutic approaches.
We studied a total of 32 uraemic patients who had ingested star fruit. Before the intoxication episodes, 20 patients were on regular haemodialysis, eight were on peritoneal dialysis and four were not yet undergoing dialysis. Two patients were analysed retrospectively from their charts, 17 were directly monitored by our clinic and 13 were referred by physicians from many areas throughout the country, allowing us to follow their outcome from a distance. Intoxicated patients were given different therapeutic approaches (haemodialysis, peritoneal dialysis and supportive treatment), and their outcomes were analysed.
The most common symptoms were persistent and intractable hiccups in 30 patients (93.75%), vomiting in 22 (68.7%), variable degrees of disturbed consciousness (mental confusion, psychomotor agitation) in 21 (65.6%), decreased muscle power, limb numbness, paresis, insomnia and paresthesias in 13 (40.6%) and seizures in seven (21.8%). Patients who were promptly treated with haemodialysis, including those with severe intoxication, recovered without sequelae. Patients with severe intoxication who were not treated or treated with peritoneal dialysis did not survive.
Haemodialysis, especially on a daily basis, is the ideal treatment for star fruit intoxication. In severe cases, continuous methods of replacement therapy may provide a superior initial procedure, since rebound effects are a common event. Peritoneal dialysis is of no use as a treatment, especially when consciousness disorders ensue.
尿毒症患者食用杨桃后的临床症状和结局差异很大,甚至可能进展至死亡。本报告旨在探讨杨桃中毒对尿毒症患者的神经毒性作用,并介绍不同治疗方法的疗效。
我们共研究了32例食用杨桃的尿毒症患者。在中毒发作前,20例患者接受定期血液透析,8例接受腹膜透析,4例尚未开始透析。2例患者通过病历进行回顾性分析,17例由我们的诊所直接监测,13例由全国各地的医生转诊而来,这使我们能够远程跟踪他们的结局。中毒患者接受了不同的治疗方法(血液透析、腹膜透析和支持治疗),并对其结局进行了分析。
最常见的症状为30例患者(93.75%)出现持续性顽固性呃逆,22例(68.7%)呕吐,21例(65.6%)出现不同程度的意识障碍(精神错乱、精神运动性激越),13例(40.6%)出现肌力下降、肢体麻木、轻瘫、失眠和感觉异常,7例(21.8%)出现癫痫发作。接受血液透析及时治疗的患者,包括重度中毒患者,均康复且无后遗症。未接受治疗或接受腹膜透析治疗的重度中毒患者均死亡。
血液透析,尤其是每日进行的血液透析,是杨桃中毒的理想治疗方法。在严重病例中,连续的替代治疗方法可能是更好的初始治疗手段,因为反跳效应很常见。腹膜透析作为一种治疗方法无效,尤其是在出现意识障碍时。