Widdershoven Guy, Berghmans Ron
Instituut voor Gezondheidsethiek, Cluster Zorgwetenschappen, Sectie Gezondheidsethiek en Wijsbegeerte, Universiteit Maastricht, Post-bus 616, 6200 MD Maastricht.
Tijdschr Gerontol Geriatr. 2002 Nov;33(5):201-6.
Competence or decision-making capacity are concepts, which are far from clear-cut. The normative consequences of an incapacity-judgment in elderly care require a balanced approach, which takes into consideration the risk of misuse in the context of the justification of interventions that are applied without consent of the patient. In this article a number of central issues in the debate on decision-making capacity are discussed. The different criteria, which are proposed to assess capacity, are discussed as well as the development of instruments in order to objectify capacity. It is concluded that the common approach towards decision-making capacity, which is strongly cognitive-oriented, is inadequate. A number of relevant aspects remain underexposed within this approach. A broader approach is explored, which takes into account the role of emotions, identity, and dialogue and deliberation. The different approaches are illustrated by way of a case example.
行为能力或决策能力是一些远非清晰明确的概念。老年护理中无行为能力判定的规范性后果需要一种平衡的方法,这种方法要考虑到在未经患者同意而实施的干预措施的正当性背景下被滥用的风险。本文讨论了决策能力辩论中的一些核心问题。还讨论了为评估能力而提出的不同标准以及为使能力客观化而开发的工具。结论是,以强烈认知为导向的决策能力常见方法是不充分的。在这种方法中,一些相关方面仍未得到充分探讨。本文探索了一种更广泛的方法,该方法考虑到了情感、身份认同以及对话与审议的作用。通过一个案例对不同方法进行了说明。