Suppr超能文献

轻度创伤性脑损伤后的结局:招募偏倚的考察

Outcome after mild traumatic brain injury: an examination of recruitment bias.

作者信息

McCullagh S, Feinstein A

机构信息

Neuropsychiatry Program, Sunnybrook and Women's College Hospital, 2075 Bayview Avenue, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M4N 3M5.

出版信息

J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2003 Jan;74(1):39-43. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.74.1.39.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Research concerning the natural history after mild traumatic brain injury (TBI) faces a number of methodological challenges, including those related to subject recruitment. The aim of this study was to determine whether subjects who agree to participate in longitudinal research differ from those who do not. The presence of identifiable, selective factors operating during recruitment may be an important source of systematic bias. In Canada, given the presence of universal healthcare coverage, this issue can be examined using population based, administrative databases to obtain information about a cohort that was approached for study enrollment, regardless of whether they ultimately agreed to participate.

METHODS

A sample of 626 consecutive patients with mild TBI was invited to enroll in TBI outcome research. Those who agreed to participate (n=272) were compared with those who refused (n=354) on demographic, past health, and injury related variables. Thereafter, using encrypted health card data, the two groups were contrasted with respect to pre-injury and post-injury healthcare utilisation.

RESULTS

No premorbid differences between the groups emerged. However, all early indices of TBI severity were significantly worse for the participants group (p<0.001). Consistent with these findings, healthcare utilisation rates were no different before injury, but were significantly increased after injury for the participants (p<0.001), even beyond the period of study enrollment (p<0.001). Differences remained even after controlling for those with significant non-TBI injuries.

CONCLUSIONS

Premorbid factors did not predict whether patients comply with, or refuse study participation. However, the participants group was biased toward those with more significant injuries, which translated into higher rates of healthcare utilisation after injury. These results strike a cautionary note, given the apparent systematic bias influencing enrollment in longitudinal studies of mild TBI.

摘要

目的

关于轻度创伤性脑损伤(TBI)后自然史的研究面临诸多方法学挑战,包括与受试者招募相关的挑战。本研究的目的是确定同意参与纵向研究的受试者与不同意的受试者是否存在差异。招募过程中存在的可识别的选择性因素可能是系统偏差的重要来源。在加拿大,鉴于全民医保覆盖的情况,可以利用基于人群的行政数据库来研究这一问题,以获取有关被邀请参加研究的队列的信息,无论他们最终是否同意参与。

方法

邀请626例连续的轻度TBI患者参与TBI结局研究。将同意参与的患者(n = 272)与拒绝参与的患者(n = 354)在人口统计学、既往健康状况和损伤相关变量方面进行比较。此后,使用加密的健康卡数据,对比两组在伤前和伤后的医疗保健利用情况。

结果

两组在病前无差异。然而,参与者组的所有TBI严重程度早期指标均明显更差(p < 0.001)。与这些发现一致,伤前医疗保健利用率无差异,但参与者伤后的利用率显著增加(p < 0.001),甚至在研究入组期之后仍显著增加(p < 0.001)。即使在控制了有严重非TBI损伤的患者后,差异仍然存在。

结论

病前因素无法预测患者是否会遵守或拒绝参与研究。然而,参与者组偏向于损伤更严重的患者,这导致伤后医疗保健利用率更高。鉴于明显的系统偏差影响轻度TBI纵向研究的入组情况,这些结果值得警示。

相似文献

3
Accuracy of mild traumatic brain injury diagnosis.轻度创伤性脑损伤诊断的准确性。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008 Aug;89(8):1550-5. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2007.12.035. Epub 2008 Jul 2.
5
Psychiatric illness after mild traumatic brain injury in children.儿童轻度创伤性脑损伤后的精神疾病
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004 Sep;85(9):1428-34. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2003.12.036.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

2
Factors influencing outcome following mild traumatic brain injury in adults.
J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2000 Jul;6(5):568-79. doi: 10.1017/s1355617700655066.
4
A randomized trial of two treatments for mild traumatic brain injury.
Brain Inj. 1998 Dec;12(12):1011-23. doi: 10.1080/026990598121927.
9
Minor head injury: attempts at clarifying the confusion.
Brain Inj. 1996 Mar;10(3):159-86. doi: 10.1080/026990596124494.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验