• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[电外科设备应用时的皮肤灼伤:责任与医学方面]

[Skin burns under application of electro-surgical devices: aspects of liability and medicine].

作者信息

von Harder Y, Scherer M A

机构信息

Ulsenheimer Friederich Rechtsanwälte, München.

出版信息

Unfallchirurg. 2002 Dec;105(12):1143-8. doi: 10.1007/s00113-002-0537-x.

DOI:10.1007/s00113-002-0537-x
PMID:12486583
Abstract

Under established jurisdiction,burn damage to the skin in connection with the use of coagulating current is not regarded as unavoidable. On the contrary, a breach of duty by the surgeon will be assumed.He is responsible for acquainting himself with the techniques and the risks of the high-frequency surgical devices he is using.He has to prevent injuries on the basis of controllable risks, even those which only appear as a result of cooperation with other specialist. The evaluation of judicial decisions, the literature, damage reports and expert opinions confirms that most injuries could have been avoided by compliance with the recommended precautions.

摘要

在既定的管辖权范围内,与使用凝固电流相关的皮肤烧伤并不被视为不可避免。相反,将假定外科医生存在失职行为。他有责任熟悉其所使用的高频手术设备的技术和风险。他必须基于可控风险预防伤害,即使是那些仅因与其他专科医生合作而出现的风险。对司法判决、文献、损害报告和专家意见的评估证实,大多数伤害通过遵守推荐的预防措施本可避免。

相似文献

1
[Skin burns under application of electro-surgical devices: aspects of liability and medicine].[电外科设备应用时的皮肤灼伤:责任与医学方面]
Unfallchirurg. 2002 Dec;105(12):1143-8. doi: 10.1007/s00113-002-0537-x.
2
[Faults and failure of tonsil surgery and other standard procedures in otorhinolaryngology].[耳鼻喉科扁桃体手术及其他标准手术的失误与失败]
Laryngorhinootologie. 2013 Apr;92 Suppl 1:S33-72. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1333253. Epub 2013 Apr 26.
3
[Injury of the rhinobasis as typical surgical risk. Expert decision of Koblenz OLG 22 November 2007 -5 U].[鼻基底损伤作为典型的手术风险。科布伦茨州高等法院2007年11月22日专家决定 - 5 U]
Laryngorhinootologie. 2010 Dec;89(12):756-7. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1247533. Epub 2010 Dec 3.
4
[Forensic aspects of bladder and ureteral injuries in standard gynecologic operations].[标准妇科手术中膀胱和输尿管损伤的法医学问题]
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 1992 Oct;52(10):632-7. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1023199.
5
[Anaesthesiological responsibility at bleeding after tonsillectomy].[扁桃体切除术后出血的麻醉责任]
Laryngorhinootologie. 2010 Feb;89(2):100-2. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1224114. Epub 2010 Feb 12.
6
[Violation of patient education responsibility. Implications and outlook].[违反患者教育责任。影响与展望]
Langenbecks Arch Chir. 1997;382(2):111-5.
7
Implant dentistry at the focus of liability lawsuits.种植牙科成为医疗责任诉讼的焦点。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2004 May-Jun;19(3):382-6.
8
Expert testimony: a contrary perspective from the trenches.
J Am Coll Radiol. 2005 Feb;2(2):131-2. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2004.06.020.
9
[Forensic aspects of complicated laparoscopic cholecystectomy].
Chirurg. 1997 Apr;68(4):395-402. doi: 10.1007/s001040050204.
10
[Treatment errors in breast surgery from the forensic viewpoint].[从法医学角度看乳腺手术中的治疗失误]
Gynakologe. 1994 Aug;27(4):249-55.