Johanning Eckardt, Fischer Siegfried, Christ Eberhard, Göres Benno, Landsbergis Paul
Occupational and Environmental Health Science, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, Department of Community Medicine, Medical Arts Building, 650 Warren St., Albany, NY 12208, USA.
AIHA J (Fairfax, Va). 2002 Jul-Aug;63(4):439-46. doi: 10.1080/15428110208984732.
Whole-body vibration exposure of locomotive engineers and the vibration attenuation of seats in 22 U.S. locomotives (built between 1959 and 2000) was studied during normal revenue service and following international measurement guidelines. Triaxial vibration measurements (duration mean 155 min, range 84-383 min) on the seat and on the floor were compared. In addition to the basic vibration evaluation (aw rms), the vector sum (av), the maximum transient vibration value (MTVV/aw), the vibration dose value (VDV/(aw T1/4)), and the vibration seat effective transmissibility factor (SEAT) were calculated. The power spectral densities are also reported. The mean basic vibration level (aw rms) was for the fore-aft axis x = 0.18 m/sec2, the lateral axis y = 0.28 m/sec2, and the vertical axis z = 0.32 m/sec2. The mean vector sum was 0.59 m/sec2 (range 0.27 to 1.44). The crest factors were generally at or above 9 in the horizontal and vertical axis. The mean MTVV/aw was 5.3 (x), 5.1 (y), and 4.8 (z), and the VDV/(aw T1/4) values ranged from 1.32 to 2.3 (x-axis), 1.33 to 1.7 (y-axis), and 1.38 to 1.86 (z-axis), generally indicating high levels of shocks. The mean seat transmissibility factor (SEAT) was 1.4 (x) and 1.2 (y) and 1 (z), demonstrating a general ineffectiveness of any of the seat suspension systems. In conclusion, these data indicate that locomotive rides are characterized by relatively high shock content (acceleration peaks) of the vibration signal in all directions. Locomotive vertical and lateral vibrations are similar, which appears to be characteristic for rail vehicles compared with many road/off-road vehicles. Tested locomotive cab seats currently in use (new or old) appear inadequate to reduce potentially harmful vibration and shocks transmitted to the seated operator, and older seats particularly lack basic ergonomic features regarding adjustability and postural support.
按照国际测量指南,在正常运营期间,对22辆美国机车(制造年份在1959年至2000年之间)的机车工程师全身振动暴露情况以及座椅的振动衰减情况进行了研究。比较了座椅和地板上的三轴振动测量结果(持续时间平均为155分钟,范围为84 - 383分钟)。除了基本振动评估(aw均方根)外,还计算了矢量和(av)、最大瞬态振动值(MTVV/aw)、振动剂量值(VDV/(aw T1/4))以及振动座椅有效传递率因子(SEAT)。还报告了功率谱密度。基本振动水平平均值(aw均方根)在前 - 后轴x = 0.18米/秒²、横向轴y = 0.28米/秒²以及垂直轴z = 0.32米/秒²。平均矢量和为0.59米/秒²(范围为0.27至1.44)。水平和垂直轴上的波峰因数通常在9或9以上。平均MTVV/aw在x轴为5.3、y轴为5.1、z轴为4.8,VDV/(aw T1/4)值在x轴范围为1.32至2.3、y轴为1.33至1.7、z轴为1.38至1.86,总体表明存在高水平的冲击。平均座椅传递率因子(SEAT)在x轴为1.4、y轴为1.2、z轴为1,这表明任何座椅悬挂系统总体上效果不佳。总之,这些数据表明机车行驶的特点是振动信号在所有方向上具有相对较高的冲击成分(加速度峰值)。机车的垂直和横向振动相似,与许多公路/越野车辆相比,这似乎是轨道车辆的特征。目前使用的经过测试的机车驾驶室座椅(新的或旧的)似乎不足以减少传递给就座操作员的潜在有害振动和冲击,而且旧座椅在可调节性和姿势支撑方面尤其缺乏基本的人体工程学特征。