• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

引言:药物治疗法庭的进展与问题

Introduction: Progress and issues in drug treatment courts.

作者信息

Harrison Lana D, Scarpitti Frank R

机构信息

Center for Drug and Alcohol Studies, University of Delaware, 77 E. Main St., Newark, DE 19716, USA.

出版信息

Subst Use Misuse. 2002;37(12-13):1441-67. doi: 10.1081/ja-120014418.

DOI:10.1081/ja-120014418
PMID:12487230
Abstract

The first drug treatment court began in Miami, Florida in 1989, in direct response to the backlog of court cases for drug possession and trafficking. By mid-2001, there were 700 operational drug treatment courts and 400 more in the planning stages in the United States. In addition to providing an overview of the growth and development of drug treatment courts in the United States, this special issue examines their development in Australia, Canada, and the United Kingdom. The primary focus is the evaluation research conducted to date, which identifies some of the critical unresolved issues facing drug treatment courts.

摘要

首个药物治疗法庭于1989年在佛罗里达州迈阿密成立,这是对毒品持有和贩运法庭案件积压的直接回应。到2001年年中,美国有700个运作中的药物治疗法庭,另有400个正处于规划阶段。除了概述美国药物治疗法庭的发展历程外,本期特刊还考察了它们在澳大利亚、加拿大和英国的发展情况。主要关注点是迄今为止进行的评估研究,该研究确定了药物治疗法庭面临的一些关键未解决问题。

相似文献

1
Introduction: Progress and issues in drug treatment courts.引言:药物治疗法庭的进展与问题
Subst Use Misuse. 2002;37(12-13):1441-67. doi: 10.1081/ja-120014418.
2
The emergence of drug treatment courts in Australia.澳大利亚毒品治疗法庭的出现。
Subst Use Misuse. 2002;37(12-13):1567-94. doi: 10.1081/ja-120014422.
3
Juvenile drug treatment courts in the United States: initial lessons learned and issues being addressed.美国青少年毒品治疗法庭:初步经验教训及正在解决的问题。
Subst Use Misuse. 2002;37(12-13):1689-722. doi: 10.1081/ja-120014427.
4
Drug treatment courts--a viable option for Canada? Sentencing issues and preliminary findings from the Toronto court.毒品治疗法庭——加拿大的一个可行选择?量刑问题及多伦多法庭的初步调查结果。
Subst Use Misuse. 2002;37(12-13):1529-66. doi: 10.1081/ja-120014421.
5
Drug treatment courts, British style: the drug treatment court movement in Britain.英式毒品治疗法庭:英国的毒品治疗法庭运动
Subst Use Misuse. 2002;37(12-13):1595-614. doi: 10.1081/ja-120014423.
6
The challenges of conducting research in drug treatment court settings.在药物治疗法庭环境中开展研究的挑战。
Subst Use Misuse. 2002;37(12-13):1635-64. doi: 10.1081/ja-120014425.
7
Drug treatment courts and the disease paradigm.药物治疗法庭与疾病范式。
Subst Use Misuse. 2002;37(12-13):1723-50. doi: 10.1081/ja-120014428.
8
Treatment inside the drug treatment court: the who, what, where, and how of treatment services.药物治疗法庭内的治疗:治疗服务的对象、内容、地点及方式。
Subst Use Misuse. 2002;37(12-13):1665-88. doi: 10.1081/ja-120014426.
9
A decade of drug treatment court research.十年的药物治疗法庭研究。
Subst Use Misuse. 2002;37(12-13):1489-527. doi: 10.1081/ja-120014420.
10
A dozen years of drug treatment courts: uncovering our theoretical foundation and the construction of a mainstream paradigm.十二年的药物治疗法庭:揭示我们的理论基础与主流范式的构建
Subst Use Misuse. 2002;37(12-13):1469-88. doi: 10.1081/ja-120014419.

引用本文的文献

1
"They won't prosecute, but they will though:" the continuing struggle between criminalization and harm reduction within the criminal justice system in the context of an opioid overdose crisis.“他们不会起诉,但他们会的:”在阿片类药物过量危机背景下,刑事司法系统内将成瘾定为犯罪与减少伤害之间的持续斗争。
Harm Reduct J. 2025 Aug 22;22(1):145. doi: 10.1186/s12954-025-01284-y.
2
Barriers to drug treatment in police diversion programs and drug courts: A qualitative analysis.警察转处计划和毒品法庭中药物治疗的障碍:定性分析。
Am J Orthopsychiatry. 2022;92(6):692-701. doi: 10.1037/ort0000643. Epub 2022 Oct 13.
3
The Effects of the Addiction Programme of Probation on Treatment Motivation, Abstinence and Quality of Life: a Comparative Study with Motivational Interviewing and Individual Intervention.
缓刑成瘾项目对治疗动机、戒断及生活质量的影响:与动机性访谈和个体干预的比较研究
Noro Psikiyatr Ars. 2018 Jun 4;55(3):261-270. doi: 10.5152/npa.2017.19440. eCollection 2018 Sep.
4
A Randomized Trial of Probation Case Management for Drug-Involved Women Offenders.针对涉毒女性罪犯的缓刑案件管理随机试验。
Crime Delinq. 2011 Mar;57(2):167-198. doi: 10.1177/0011128708318944.
5
The influence of legal coercion on dropout from substance abuse treatment: results from a national survey.法律强制手段对药物滥用治疗脱失率的影响:一项全国性调查结果
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2008 Jan 1;92(1-3):123-31. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2007.07.011. Epub 2007 Sep 14.
6
Trends in drop out, drug free discharge and rates of re-presentation: a retrospective cohort study of drug treatment clients in the North West of England.退出治疗、戒毒出院及再次就诊率的趋势:对英格兰西北部药物治疗患者的一项回顾性队列研究
BMC Public Health. 2006 Aug 11;6:205. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-6-205.