Foster E Michael
The Pennsylvania State University, University Park 16802-6500, USA.
Child Dev. 2002 Nov-Dec;73(6):1904-14. doi: 10.1111/1467-8624.00513.
Research in child development reveals that the sources, level, stability, and uses of family resources have a profound effect on children's well-being and long-term outcomes. Although that research has incorporated economic constructs and measures, developmentalists generally ignore the formal economic framework for thinking about family resources and child outcomes. Building on the premise that children are an investment, that framework explains how families allocate resources and links that decision to other family choices and to key child outcomes, such as schooling, morbidity, and mortality among others. This article explains economists' general approach to family behavior (the so-called theory of household production) and then describes how that framework is useful for thinking about families and children. The article then outlines how economists model parental investment in children and examines the implications of that approach for developmental science. This discussion is illustrated using an example of interest to developmentalists--the involvement of children and adolescents in after-school activities. A concluding section discusses the benefits of and potential barriers to collaboration between economists and developmentalists.
儿童发展研究表明,家庭资源的来源、水平、稳定性及其用途对儿童的幸福和长期发展结果有着深远影响。尽管该研究已纳入经济概念和衡量标准,但发展心理学家通常忽略了用于思考家庭资源和儿童发展结果的正式经济框架。基于儿童是一种投资这一前提,该框架解释了家庭如何分配资源,并将这一决策与其他家庭选择以及关键的儿童发展结果(如上学、发病率和死亡率等)联系起来。本文解释了经济学家研究家庭行为的一般方法(即所谓的家庭生产理论),然后描述了该框架如何有助于思考家庭与儿童。接着,本文概述了经济学家如何构建父母对子女投资的模型,并探讨了该方法对发展科学的影响。我们将以一个发展心理学家感兴趣的例子——儿童和青少年参与课外活动——来说明这一讨论。结语部分讨论了经济学家与发展心理学家合作的益处及潜在障碍。