Eccles J S
University of Colorado.
Nebr Symp Motiv. 1992;40:145-208.
In this chapter we have presented two perspectives on the link between social context and the following motivational constructs: self-concept of ability and sense of personal efficacy in specific activity domains; perceptions of the value of skills in various domains; interest in various activities; activity choice; persistence; performance; and general self-esteem. In the first section, we discussed how social-contextual variables in both the family and the home could produce individual differences in the motivational constructs of interest. We presented a general framework for thinking about this issue and summarized our recent empirical work. In the second section, we discussed how systematic changes in the social environments that confront children as they develop could explain age-related changes in the motivational constructs of interest. Again we presented a general framework for thinking about this issue and summarized our empirical work testing the hypotheses generated from this framework. Throughout this section we have argued that optimal development takes place when there is good stage-environment fit between the needs of developing individuals and the opportunities afforded in their social environments. Furthermore, we suggested that the negative changes in motivational variables often associated with early adolescent development result from regressive changes in school and home environments. For example, the transition to junior high school, in particular, often confronts early adolescents with regressive environmental changes such as a decrease in the opportunity to participate in classroom decision making, a decrease in teacher support and teacher efficacy, and an increase in teaching styles and reporting practices likely to induce a focus on relative ability and comparative performance as well as excessive social comparison. Not surprisingly, there is also a decrease in intrinsic motivation and an increase in school misbehavior associated with this transition, and these changes are most apparent among adolescents who report regressive changes in the characteristics of classroom and school social environment. Such motivational changes are not apparent in adolescents who report the more developmentally appropriate shifts in the social context at school. Although our analysis of the family data is not as complete as our analysis of the classroom data, we have found evidence that a similar process may be going on in the family in relation to issues of control and autonomy. Excessive parental control is linked to lower intrinsic school motivation, to more negative change in self-esteem following the junior high school transition, to more school misbehavior, and to relatively greater investment in peer social attachments.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
在本章中,我们从两个角度探讨了社会环境与以下动机结构之间的联系:特定活动领域中的能力自我概念和个人效能感;对各领域技能价值的认知;对各种活动的兴趣;活动选择;坚持性;表现;以及总体自尊。在第一部分,我们讨论了家庭和家庭环境中的社会背景变量如何在兴趣的动机结构方面产生个体差异。我们提出了一个思考这一问题的总体框架,并总结了我们最近的实证研究工作。在第二部分,我们讨论了儿童成长过程中所面临的社会环境的系统性变化如何解释兴趣的动机结构中与年龄相关的变化。我们再次提出了一个思考这一问题的总体框架,并总结了我们检验从该框架得出的假设的实证研究工作。在本节中,我们一直认为,当发展中的个体的需求与他们社会环境所提供的机会之间实现良好的阶段 - 环境匹配时,最佳发展就会发生。此外,我们认为与青少年早期发展相关的动机变量的负面变化是由学校和家庭环境的退行性变化导致的。例如,特别是向初中的过渡,常常使青少年面临退行性的环境变化,如参与课堂决策的机会减少、教师支持和教师效能下降,以及教学风格和汇报方式的变化,这些变化可能导致关注相对能力和比较表现以及过度的社会比较。不出所料,与此过渡相关的还有内在动机的下降和学校行为问题的增加,而这些变化在报告课堂和学校社会环境特征有退行性变化的青少年中最为明显。在报告学校社会环境有更符合发展阶段转变的青少年中,这种动机变化并不明显。虽然我们对家庭数据的分析不如对课堂数据的分析完整,但我们发现有证据表明,在家庭中,与控制和自主性问题相关的类似过程可能正在发生。过度的父母控制与较低的学校内在动机、初中过渡后自尊的更多负面变化、更多的学校行为问题以及对同伴社会依恋的相对更大投入有关。(摘要截选至400字)