• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

全科医疗中抑郁症评估的信度与效度:简短抑郁访谈(SDI)

Reliability and validity of the assessment of depression in general practice: the Short Depression Interview (SDI).

作者信息

Terluin Berend, van Hout Hein P J, van Marwijk Harm W J, Adèr Herman J, van der Meer Klaas, de Haan Marten, van Dyck Richard

机构信息

Department of General Practice, Institute for Research in Extramural Medicine, VU Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2002 Nov-Dec;24(6):396-405. doi: 10.1016/s0163-8343(02)00211-6.

DOI:10.1016/s0163-8343(02)00211-6
PMID:12490341
Abstract

General practitioners (GPs) are recommended to use DSM-IV criteria to diagnose major depression in daily clinical practice. This implies the assessment of nine depressive symptoms and four additional criteria. A short structured interview has been developed to assess these symptoms and criteria, and a study was carried out to investigate the reliability and validity with which GPs can assess these symptoms and criteria and the DSM-IV diagnosis of major depression. In 14 general practices, 52 patients with symptoms of distress and depression were interviewed twice by their GP, with an interval of one to four days. Furthermore, the patients filled out three depression questionnaires. The reproducibility of eight symptoms and three additional criteria was moderate to good (kappa >0.40). The reproducibility of the depressive symptom count, that is necessary to arrive at a diagnosis of major depression, was such that in 75 percent of the patients the test-retest difference did not exceed one symptom. The reproducibility of the diagnosis of major depression was good (kappa 0.63). The validity of the diagnosis of major depression assessed by the GPs, as compared to results of the self-report depression questionnaires, was satisfactory (r 0.35-0.61). Diagnosing major depression in patients with depressive symptomatology just above or below the threshold of major depression warrants a certain amount of caution in general practice.

摘要

建议全科医生(GPs)在日常临床实践中使用《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版(DSM-IV)标准来诊断重度抑郁症。这意味着要评估九种抑郁症状和另外四条标准。现已开发出一种简短的结构化访谈来评估这些症状和标准,并开展了一项研究,以调查全科医生评估这些症状、标准以及重度抑郁症的DSM-IV诊断的可靠性和有效性。在14家全科诊所中,52名有痛苦和抑郁症状的患者由其全科医生进行了两次访谈,间隔时间为1至4天。此外,患者还填写了三份抑郁问卷。八种症状和三条附加标准的可重复性为中等至良好(kappa>0.40)。得出重度抑郁症诊断所需的抑郁症状计数的可重复性表明,75%的患者重测差异不超过一种症状。重度抑郁症诊断的可重复性良好(kappa 0.63)。与自我报告抑郁问卷的结果相比,全科医生评估的重度抑郁症诊断的有效性令人满意(r 0.35 - 0.61)。在日常实践中,对抑郁症状略高于或略低于重度抑郁症阈值的患者进行重度抑郁症诊断时需要一定的谨慎。

相似文献

1
Reliability and validity of the assessment of depression in general practice: the Short Depression Interview (SDI).全科医疗中抑郁症评估的信度与效度:简短抑郁访谈(SDI)
Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2002 Nov-Dec;24(6):396-405. doi: 10.1016/s0163-8343(02)00211-6.
2
Web-based tools can be used reliably to detect patients with major depressive disorder and subsyndromal depressive symptoms.基于网络的工具可可靠地用于检测患有重度抑郁症和亚综合征抑郁症状的患者。
BMC Psychiatry. 2007 Apr 10;7:12. doi: 10.1186/1471-244X-7-12.
3
Reliability and validity of a self-report scale for daily assessments of the severity of depressive symptoms.用于日常评估抑郁症状严重程度的自报量表的信度和效度。
Psychiatry Res. 2018 Dec;270:581-586. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2018.10.007. Epub 2018 Oct 2.
4
[Preliminary comparative study of the personality disorder evaluation DIP instrument with the semi-structured SCID-II interview].[人格障碍评估工具DIP与半结构化访谈SCID-II的初步比较研究]
Encephale. 2009 Dec;35(6):544-53. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2008.09.007.
5
[Personality disorders in a nonclinical sample of adolescents].[青少年非临床样本中的人格障碍]
Encephale. 2002 Nov-Dec;28(6 Pt 1):520-4.
6
[Prevalence of psychiatric disorders in French general practice using the patient health questionnaire: comparison with GP case-recognition and psychotropic medication prescription].[使用患者健康问卷评估法国全科医疗中精神障碍的患病率:与全科医生病例识别及精神药物处方的比较]
Encephale. 2009 Dec;35(6):560-9. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2008.06.018.
7
Does the DSM-IV clinical significance criterion for major depression reduce false positives? Evidence from the National Comorbidity Survey Replication.DSM-IV 用于重性抑郁障碍的临床显著标准是否降低了假阳性率?来自国家共病调查再调查的证据。
Am J Psychiatry. 2010 Mar;167(3):298-304. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2009.09040553. Epub 2010 Jan 15.
8
The Diagnostic Inventory for Depression: a self-report scale to diagnose DSM-IV major depressive disorder.抑郁症诊断量表:一种用于诊断《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版重度抑郁症的自评量表。
J Clin Psychol. 2004 Jan;60(1):87-110. doi: 10.1002/jclp.10207.
9
The validity of DSM symptoms for depression and anxiety disorders during pregnancy.孕期抑郁和焦虑障碍的 DSM 症状的有效性。
J Affect Disord. 2011 Oct;133(3):546-52. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2011.05.004.
10
A clinically useful self-report measure of the DSM-5 anxious distress specifier for major depressive disorder.一种针对重度抑郁症的DSM-5焦虑痛苦特征的具有临床实用性的自我报告测量方法。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2014 Jun;75(6):601-7. doi: 10.4088/JCP.13m08961.

引用本文的文献

1
Nature and Outcomes of Longitudinal Authentic Leadership Profiles.纵向真实领导形象的本质与结果
J Healthc Leadersh. 2025 May 25;17:189-209. doi: 10.2147/JHL.S486730. eCollection 2025.
2
Impact at two years of an intervention on empowerment among medical care teams: study protocol of a randomised controlled trial in a large French university hospital.干预对医疗团队赋权的影响:一项在法国大型大学医院进行的随机对照试验的研究方案。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Dec 3;19(1):927. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4724-7.
3
Antidepressant use and risk of suicide and attempted suicide or self harm in people aged 20 to 64: cohort study using a primary care database.
20至64岁人群使用抗抑郁药与自杀、自杀未遂或自我伤害风险的关系:利用初级保健数据库进行的队列研究
BMJ. 2015 Feb 18;350:h517. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h517.
4
Detecting depressive and anxiety disorders in distressed patients in primary care; comparative diagnostic accuracy of the Four-Dimensional Symptom Questionnaire (4DSQ) and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS).在初级保健中识别痛苦患者的抑郁和焦虑障碍;四维症状问卷(4DSQ)与医院焦虑抑郁量表(HADS)的比较诊断准确性。
BMC Fam Pract. 2009 Aug 23;10:58. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-10-58.
5
The Four-Dimensional Symptom Questionnaire (4DSQ): a validation study of a multidimensional self-report questionnaire to assess distress, depression, anxiety and somatization.四维症状问卷(4DSQ):一份用于评估痛苦、抑郁、焦虑和躯体化的多维自陈问卷的效度研究
BMC Psychiatry. 2006 Aug 22;6:34. doi: 10.1186/1471-244X-6-34.