Harfst T, Koch U, Schulz H
Klinik und Poliklinik für Innere Medizin, Abteilung Medizinische Psychologie, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf.
Rehabilitation (Stuttg). 2002 Dec;41(6):407-14. doi: 10.1055/s-2002-36285.
The recommendations for aftercare listed in discharge reports represent a core component of communication between inpatient psychosomatic rehabilitation and ambulatory follow-up care. The standardized discharge report used by the pension insurance institutes makes use of a generic category system for systematization and simplification of recommendations for aftercare. Neither the practice of making recommendations for aftercare as observed by therapists and physicians responsible for treatment in the inpatient setting nor the appropriateness and differentiation of the category system has previously been systematically examined. A randomized sample of discharge reports was analyzed for this purpose.
A sample of 500 discharge reports from an inpatient-oriented psychosomatic rehabilitation setting were analyzed regarding the categories of recommended aftercare measures and their relationship with socio-demographic variables, clinical diagnosis and sociomedical variables.
Outpatient psychotherapy represents the most frequently recommended aftercare treatment, being suggested in nearly 70% of the patients. Further substantial percentages were found in recommendations for areas including occupational rehabilitation, somatic-medical recommendations, and recommendations for health behaviour and self-help groups. In approximately one quarter of the patients, recommendations for aftercare were given that were coded under the category of "other suggestions". In younger and socio-medically burdened patients, recommendations for the fields of occupational rehabilitation and psychotherapy were more frequently given. In patients with a somatic illness or a somatoform disorder as the primary diagnosis, recommendations within the field of outpatient psychotherapy were found less frequently, while recommendations in the somatic-medical area were more commonly found.
The results give some support for the clinical validity of the form of recommendations given for aftercare measures in an inpatient psychosomatic rehabilitation setting. At the same time, the analyses indicate excessive as well as insufficient differentiation in the generic category system for follow-up treatment recommendations, which could lead to a loss of valuable information at the interface between inpatient and outpatient treatments.
出院报告中列出的后续护理建议是住院身心康复与门诊后续护理之间沟通的核心组成部分。养老保险机构使用的标准化出院报告采用通用类别系统,以系统化和简化后续护理建议。此前,负责住院治疗的治疗师和医生提出的后续护理建议实践,以及该类别系统的适当性和区分度均未得到系统研究。为此,对出院报告的随机样本进行了分析。
分析了来自以住院治疗为主的身心康复机构的500份出院报告样本,内容涉及推荐的后续护理措施类别及其与社会人口统计学变量、临床诊断和社会医学变量的关系。
门诊心理治疗是最常被推荐的后续护理治疗,近70%的患者被建议采用。在职业康复、躯体医学建议、健康行为和自助团体等领域的建议中,也有相当大的比例。约四分之一的患者得到了归类为“其他建议”的后续护理建议。在年轻和社会医学负担较重的患者中,职业康复和心理治疗领域的建议更为常见。以躯体疾病或躯体形式障碍为主要诊断的患者,门诊心理治疗领域的建议较少,而躯体医学领域的建议则更为常见。
研究结果为住院身心康复环境中后续护理措施建议形式的临床有效性提供了一定支持。同时,分析表明,后续治疗建议的通用类别系统存在区分过度和不足的问题,这可能导致住院和门诊治疗衔接处的宝贵信息丢失。