Hicken B L, Sharara A I, Abrams G A, Eloubeidi M, Fallon M B, Arguedas M R
Department of Psychology, University of Alabama, Birmingham, AL, USA.
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2003 Jan;17(1):145-53. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2036.2003.01391.x.
The measurement of the hepatic venous pressure gradient may identify a suboptimal response to beta-blockers in patients with varices at risk for bleeding. However, the cost-effectiveness of routine hepatic venous pressure gradient measurements to guide primary prophylaxis has not been examined.
We used decision analysis to evaluate two hepatic venous pressure gradient measurement strategies relative to standard beta-blocker therapy in a hypothetical cohort of patients with high-risk varices: (i) hepatic venous pressure gradient measurement 4 weeks after the initiation of beta-blocker therapy; and (ii) hepatic venous pressure gradient measurement prior to and 4 weeks after the initiation of beta-blocker therapy. The total expected costs, variceal bleeding episodes and deaths were calculated over a 1-year time horizon.
Beta-blocker therapy was associated with total costs of $1464, seven variceal bleeding episodes, one variceal bleeding episode-related death and 15 deaths. One hepatic venous pressure gradient measurement was associated with total costs of $5015, four variceal bleeding episodes, one variceal bleeding episode-related death and 15 deaths. Two hepatic venous pressure gradient measurements were associated with total costs of $8657, four episodes of variceal bleeding, one variceal bleeding episode-related death and 15 deaths. Compared with beta-blocker therapy alone, the incremental costs per variceal bleeding episode prevented and death averted were, respectively, $108 185 and $355 100 (one hepatic venous pressure gradient measurement) and $202 796 and $719 300 (two hepatic venous pressure gradient measurements). The results were sensitive to the time horizon of the analysis, the probability of bleeding whilst on beta-blockers and the cost of hepatic venous pressure gradient measurement.
Hepatic venous pressure gradient measurement to guide primary prophylaxis is an expensive strategy for reducing variceal bleeding or death, especially in patients with limited life expectancy, such as those with advanced, decompensated cirrhosis.
肝静脉压力梯度的测量可能有助于识别静脉曲张有出血风险的患者对β受体阻滞剂的反应欠佳情况。然而,常规测量肝静脉压力梯度以指导一级预防的成本效益尚未得到研究。
我们采用决策分析方法,在一个假设的高危静脉曲张患者队列中,评估相对于标准β受体阻滞剂治疗的两种肝静脉压力梯度测量策略:(i)β受体阻滞剂治疗开始4周后测量肝静脉压力梯度;(ii)β受体阻滞剂治疗开始前及开始4周后测量肝静脉压力梯度。在1年的时间范围内计算总预期成本、静脉曲张出血事件和死亡人数。
β受体阻滞剂治疗的总成本为1464美元,发生7次静脉曲张出血事件,1例与静脉曲张出血事件相关的死亡,以及15例死亡。进行1次肝静脉压力梯度测量的总成本为5015美元,发生4次静脉曲张出血事件,1例与静脉曲张出血事件相关的死亡,以及15例死亡。进行2次肝静脉压力梯度测量的总成本为8657美元,发生4次静脉曲张出血事件,1例与静脉曲张出血事件相关的死亡,以及15例死亡。与单独使用β受体阻滞剂治疗相比,预防每例静脉曲张出血事件和避免每例死亡的增量成本分别为108185美元和355100美元(进行1次肝静脉压力梯度测量)以及202796美元和719300美元(进行2次肝静脉压力梯度测量)。结果对分析的时间范围、服用β受体阻滞剂期间出血的概率以及肝静脉压力梯度测量的成本敏感。
测量肝静脉压力梯度以指导一级预防是一种昂贵的策略,用于减少静脉曲张出血或死亡,特别是在预期寿命有限的患者中,如晚期失代偿性肝硬化患者。