Ferri A, Scaglioni G, Pousson M, Capodaglio P, Van Hoecke J, Narici M V
Centro Studi Attività Motorie (CSAM), Fondazione S. Maugeri, Clinica del Lavoro e della Riabilitazione, IRCCS, Pavia, Italy.
Acta Physiol Scand. 2003 Jan;177(1):69-78. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-201X.2003.01050.x.
The aim of the present study was to assess and compare the improvements of muscle strength and power induced by a 16-week resistive programme in a population of 16 older men aged 65-81 years.
Training was performed three times per week at an intensity of 80% of one repetition maximum (1RM) and consisted of both calf raise and leg press exercises. Before-, during- and after-training, maximum isometric and isokinetic torques, maximum power, 1RM, muscle cross-sectional area (CSA) and electromyographic activity (EMG) of the plantar flexors (PF) and knee extensors (KE) were examined.
For the KE and PF, respectively, training resulted in a 29.9 +/- 4.4% (mean +/- SE) and 21.6 +/- 5.4% increase in 1RM (P < 0.001-0.01), a 19.4 +/- 4.3 and 12.4 +/- 4.7% (P < 0.001-0.05) increase in maximum isometric torque, and a 24.1 +/- 6.3 and 33.1 +/- 10.9% (P < 0.05) increase in maximum muscle power, calculated from torque-angular velocity curves. The large increase in torque and power was partly accounted by a significant increase in the CSA of the PF (5.0 +/- 0.7%) and KE (7.4 +/- 0.7%), while no significant changes in integrated EMG activity of vastus lateralis and soleus muscles, and in extrapolated maximum shortening velocity were found. After training, a significant increase in torque/CSA (10.3 +/- 4%, P < 0.05) was found for the KE but not for the PF.
Hence, hypertrophy cannot alone justify the increase in torque, and other factors, such as an increase in individual fibre-specific tension (in the case of KE), a decrease in antagonist muscles' coactivation, an improved co-ordination and an increased neural drive of the other heads of quadriceps may have contributed to the increments in strength. The significant increase in muscle power seems particularly noteworthy with respect to daily activities involving the displacement of the body over time, namely, the generation of muscle power.
本研究旨在评估和比较一项为期16周的阻力训练计划对16名年龄在65 - 81岁的老年男性肌肉力量和功率的改善情况。
训练每周进行三次,强度为一次重复最大值(1RM)的80%,包括提踵和腿举练习。在训练前、训练期间和训练后,检测跖屈肌(PF)和膝伸肌(KE)的最大等长和等速扭矩、最大功率、1RM、肌肉横截面积(CSA)以及肌电图活动(EMG)。
对于KE和PF,训练分别使1RM增加了29.9±4.4%(平均值±标准误)和21.6±5.4%(P<0.001 - 0.01),最大等长扭矩增加了19.4±4.3%和12.4±4.7%(P<0.001 - 0.05),根据扭矩 - 角速度曲线计算得出的最大肌肉功率增加了24.1±6.3%和33.1±10.9%(P<0.05)。扭矩和功率的大幅增加部分归因于PF(5.0±0.7%)和KE(7.4±0.7%)的CSA显著增加,而股外侧肌和比目鱼肌的积分EMG活动以及外推的最大缩短速度没有显著变化。训练后,KE的扭矩/CSA显著增加(10.3±4%,P<0.05),而PF没有。
因此,肥大不能单独解释扭矩的增加,其他因素,如个体纤维特异性张力的增加(对于KE)、拮抗肌共激活的减少、协调性的改善以及股四头肌其他头的神经驱动增加,可能对力量的增加有贡献。肌肉功率的显著增加对于涉及身体随时间位移的日常活动,即肌肉功率的产生,似乎特别值得注意。