Richards M P
Department of Archaeological Sciences, University of Bradford, Bradford, UK.
Eur J Clin Nutr. 2002 Dec;56(12):16 p following 1262. doi: 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1601646.
Knowledge of our ancestor's diets is becoming increasingly important in evolutionary medicine, as researchers have argued that we have evolved to specific type of 'Palaeolithic' diet, and many modern nutritional disorders relate to the mismatch between the diet to which we have evolved, and the relatively newer agricultural-based 'Neolithic' diets. However, what is the archaeological evidence for pre-agricultural diets and how have they changed over the four million years of hominid evolution? This paper briefly introduces the three lines of evidence we have for Palaeolithic and Neolithic diets; morphological changes, archaeological material evidence, and direct measurement of diet from bone chemistry. The morphological changes, increasing gracilization of the mandible and increasing brain size have been interpreted (based on analogies with living primates) as the move from plants to higher-quality, more digestible, animal meat, although this is debated. The archaeological evidence is especially weak, as many organic materials, especially plants, do not survive well, and are therefore invisible in the archaeological record. Artefacts, such as stone tools which are likely to be used for hunting and animal bones with evidence of human processing and butchering do indicate that hunting did occur at many times in the past, but it is impossible to judge the frequency. Direct evidence from bone chemistry, such as the measurement of the stable isotopes of carbon and nitrogen, do provide direct evidence of past diet, and limited studies on five Neanderthals from three sites, as well as a number of modern Palaeolithic and Mesolithic humans indicates the importance of animal protein in diets. There is a significant change in the archaeological record associated with the introduction of agriculture worldwide, and an associated general decline in health in some areas. However, there is an rapid increase in population associated with domestication of plants, so although in some regions individual health suffers after the Neolithic revolution, as a species humans have greatly expanded their population worldwide.
了解我们祖先的饮食在进化医学中变得越来越重要,因为研究人员认为我们已经进化到适应特定类型的“旧石器时代”饮食,而许多现代营养失调与我们进化所适应的饮食和相对较新的以农业为基础的“新石器时代”饮食之间的不匹配有关。然而,关于农业出现之前的饮食,考古证据是什么?在四百多万年的人类进化过程中,它们又是如何变化的呢?本文简要介绍了我们所拥有的关于旧石器时代和新石器时代饮食的三条证据线索:形态变化、考古物质证据以及通过骨骼化学对饮食的直接测量。形态变化方面,下颌骨日益纤细以及脑容量不断增大(基于与现存灵长类动物的类比)被解释为从植物性食物转向更高质量、更易消化的动物性食物,尽管这一观点存在争议。考古证据尤为薄弱,因为许多有机物质,尤其是植物,保存状况不佳,因此在考古记录中难以显现。诸如可能用于狩猎的石器以及带有人类加工和屠宰痕迹的动物骨骼等人工制品确实表明过去曾多次发生狩猎行为,但无法判断其频率。来自骨骼化学的直接证据,如碳和氮稳定同位素的测量,确实提供了过去饮食的直接证据,对来自三个遗址的五名尼安德特人以及一些现代旧石器时代和中石器时代人类的有限研究表明动物蛋白在饮食中的重要性。在全球范围内,随着农业的引入,考古记录发生了重大变化,一些地区的健康状况也随之普遍下降。然而,随着植物驯化,人口迅速增长,所以尽管在新石器革命后某些地区的个人健康受到影响,但作为一个物种而言,人类在全球范围内的人口数量大幅增加。