Bersh Philip J, Whitehouse Wayne G, Laurence Michael T
Department of Psychology, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA 19122, USA.
J Gen Psychol. 2002 Oct;129(4):430-42. doi: 10.1080/00221300209602106.
Rats were trained on a free-operant procedure in which the duration of randomly occurring shocks depended on the interresponse times of lever presses. Shocks of 1.6-mA intensity were delivered at random intervals with an average density of 10 shocks per min. Each shock that was delivered lasted 0.3 s as long as the interresponse times were within a preset limit. Whenever the interresponse time exceeded the limit, the shocks that were delivered lasted 1 s until the occurrence of a response that met the limit. The limit was reduced in 3-s steps from 15 s to either 6 s or 3 s, at which point 3 of the animals were exposed to an ascending series. The avoidance of long-duration shocks was highly efficient at the 15-s and 12-s limits, and it decreased at the 9-s limit. With the exception of one animal, performance was substantially worse at the 6-s limit and it deteriorated for all the animals that were exposed to the 3-s limit. The data suggest that shock-duration reduction is quite effective as negative reinforcement for avoidance but is perhaps less effective than shock-intensity reduction.
大鼠接受了一种自由操作程序的训练,其中随机出现的电击持续时间取决于杠杆按压的反应间隔时间。强度为1.6毫安的电击以随机间隔施加,平均密度为每分钟10次电击。只要反应间隔时间在预设限度内,每次施加的电击持续0.3秒。每当反应间隔时间超过限度时,施加的电击持续1秒,直到出现符合限度的反应。限度以3秒的步长从15秒降至6秒或3秒,此时3只动物接受了一个递增系列的训练。在15秒和12秒的限度下,避免长时间电击的效率很高,而在9秒的限度下效率降低。除了一只动物外,在6秒的限度下表现明显更差,而对于所有接受3秒限度训练的动物来说,表现都恶化了。数据表明,减少电击持续时间作为回避的负强化相当有效,但可能不如降低电击强度有效。