University of Pittsburgh at Greensburg, Greensburg, PA 15601, USA.
J Exp Anal Behav. 2012 Nov;98(3):311-40. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2012.98-311.
Although response-dependent shock often suppresses responding, response facilitation can occur. In two experiments, we examined the suppressive and facilitative effects of shock by manipulating shock intensity and the interresponse times that produced shock. Rats' lever presses were reinforced on a variable-interval 40-s schedule of food presentation. Shock followed either long or short interresponse times. Shock intensity was raised from 0.05 mA to 0.4 mA or 0.8 mA. Overall, shock contingent on long interresponse times punished long interresponse times and increased response rates. Shock contingent on short interresponse times punished short interresponse times and decreased response rates. In Experiment 1, raising the range of interresponse times that produced shock enhanced these effects. In Experiment 2, the effects of shock intensity depended on the interresponse times that produced shock. When long interresponse times produced shock, low intensities increased response rates. High intensities decreased response rates. When short interresponse times produced shock, high shock intensities punished short interresponse times and decreased response rates more than low intensities. The results may explain why punishment procedures occasionally facilitate responding and establish parameters for future studies of punishment.
虽然反应依赖的电击通常会抑制反应,但也可能出现反应促进。在两项实验中,我们通过操纵电击强度和产生电击的反应间时程来考察电击的抑制和促进效应。大鼠的压杆反应在一个食物呈现的可变间隔 40 秒的时间表上得到强化。当长或短反应间时程出现时,电击就会出现。电击强度从 0.05mA 提高到 0.4mA 或 0.8mA。总的来说,长反应间时程引发的电击会惩罚长反应间时程,并增加反应率。短反应间时程引发的电击会惩罚短反应间时程,并降低反应率。在实验 1 中,增加引发电击的反应间时程范围增强了这些效应。在实验 2 中,电击强度的影响取决于引发电击的反应间时程。当长反应间时程引发电击时,低强度会增加反应率。高强度则会降低反应率。当短反应间时程引发电击时,高强度的电击比低强度更能惩罚短反应间时程,并降低反应率。这些结果可能解释了为什么惩罚程序偶尔会促进反应,并为未来的惩罚研究确定了参数。