Troisi Alfonso, McGuire Michael
Department of Neurosciences, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy.
Neuro Endocrinol Lett. 2002 Dec;23 Suppl 4:31-8.
In this paper, we discuss the concept of mental disorder from the perspective of Darwinian psychiatry. Using this perspective does not resolve all of the quandaries which philosophers of medicine face when trying to provide a general definition of disease. However, it does take an important step toward clarifying why current methods of psychiatric diagnosis are criticizable and how clinicians can improve the identification of true mental disorders. According to Darwinian psychiatry, the validity of the conventional criteria of psychiatric morbidity is dependent on their association with functional impairment. Suffering, statistical deviance, and physical lesion are frequent correlates of mental disorders but, in absence of dysfunctional consequences, none of these criteria is sufficient for considering a psychological or behavioral condition as a psychiatric disorder. The Darwinian concept of mental disorder builds from two basic ideas: (1) the capacity to achieve biological goals is the best single attribute that characterizes mental health; and (2), the assessment of functional capacities cannot be properly made without consideration of the environment in which the individual lives. These two ideas reflect a concept of mental disorder that is both functional and ecological. A correct application of evolutionary knowledge should not necessarily lead to the conclusion that therapeutic intervention should be limited to conditions that jeopardize biological adaptation. Because one of the basic aims of medicine is to alleviate human suffering, an understanding of the evolutionary foundations of the concept of mental disorder should translate into more effective ways for promoting individual and social well-being, not into the search for natural laws determining what is therapeutically right or wrong.
在本文中,我们从达尔文主义精神病学的角度探讨精神障碍的概念。运用这一视角并不能解决医学哲学家在试图给出疾病的一般定义时所面临的所有难题。然而,它确实朝着阐明为何当前的精神病诊断方法会受到批评以及临床医生如何能够改进对真正精神障碍的识别迈出了重要的一步。根据达尔文主义精神病学,传统的精神病发病率标准的有效性取决于它们与功能损害的关联。痛苦、统计偏差和身体损伤常常与精神障碍相关,但在没有功能障碍后果的情况下,这些标准中没有一个足以将一种心理或行为状况视为精神疾病。达尔文主义的精神障碍概念基于两个基本观点:(1)实现生物学目标的能力是表征心理健康的最佳单一属性;(2)如果不考虑个体生活的环境,就无法正确评估功能能力。这两个观点反映了一种既具有功能性又具有生态学意义的精神障碍概念。正确应用进化知识不一定会得出治疗干预应仅限于危及生物适应的状况这一结论。因为医学的基本目标之一是减轻人类痛苦,所以对精神障碍概念的进化基础的理解应该转化为促进个体和社会福祉的更有效方式,而不是去寻找决定治疗对错的自然法则。