Department of Systems Medicine Clinical Psychiatry Unit, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy.
Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci. 2015 May-Jun;6(3):323-31. doi: 10.1002/wcs.1339. Epub 2015 Jan 23.
Medicalization of human behavioral diversity is a recurrent theme in the history of psychiatry, and the problem of defining what is a genuine mental disorder is an unresolved question since the origins of clinical psychopathology. Darwinian psychiatry can formulate a definition of mental disorder that is value free and based on factual criteria. From an evolutionary perspective, genuine mental disorders are maladaptive conditions. The ultimate function of an adaptation is gene propagation via maximization of survival and reproduction. It follows that a distressing and/or disabling psychological or behavioral syndrome is a psychiatric disorder only if it impacts negatively on the individual's inclusive fitness. However, in many cases, an evolutionary definition of disorder cannot be reconciled with current social values. Thus, clinicians adopting the evolutionary approach should conform to the prevailing trend of contemporary medicine and accept that their task is to be healers of the distressed, not watchdogs of biological adaptation. These pragmatic considerations do not minimize the scientific validity of the Darwinian definition of mental disorders. Probably, its major contribution to psychiatric theory is the elimination of the necessity to find a brain lesion or dysfunctional mechanism to validate the distinction between disorders and non-disorders.
人类行为多样性的医学化是精神病学史中的一个反复出现的主题,而自临床病理学起源以来,定义什么是真正的精神障碍就是一个悬而未决的问题。达尔文式精神病学可以制定一个没有价值判断且基于事实标准的精神障碍定义。从进化的角度来看,真正的精神障碍是适应不良的情况。适应的最终功能是通过最大化生存和繁殖来传播基因。因此,只有当痛苦和/或使人丧失能力的心理或行为综合征对个体的综合适应度产生负面影响时,它才是一种精神障碍。然而,在许多情况下,对障碍的进化定义与当前的社会价值观无法协调一致。因此,采用进化方法的临床医生应该顺应当代医学的主流趋势,并接受这样一个事实,即他们的任务是治愈痛苦的人,而不是生物适应的监督者。这些实际考虑并没有降低达尔文式精神障碍定义的科学有效性。也许,它对精神病学理论的主要贡献是消除了寻找脑损伤或功能障碍机制来验证障碍和非障碍之间区别的必要性。