Suppr超能文献

通过阻断D1而非D2受体选择性减轻大鼠强迫性杠杆按压行为:D1受体参与强迫症的可能意义。

Selective alleviation of compulsive lever-pressing in rats by D1, but not D2, blockade: possible implications for the involvement of D1 receptors in obsessive-compulsive disorder.

作者信息

Joel Daphna, Doljansky Julia

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Tel Aviv University, Romat-Aviv, Israel.

出版信息

Neuropsychopharmacology. 2003 Jan;28(1):77-85. doi: 10.1038/sj.npp.1300010.

Abstract

Rats undergoing extinction of lever-pressing for food after the attenuation of an external feedback for this behavior exhibit excessive lever-pressing unaccompanied by an attempt to collect a reward. This behavior may be analogous to the excessive and unreasonable behavior seen in obsessive-compulsive disorder. In the present study, we tested the hypothesis that the compulsive behavior induced by signal attenuation is mediated via D(1) rather than D(2) receptors. Administration of 0.005, 0.01 and 0.03 mg/kg of the D(1) antagonist SCH 23390 reduced the number of compulsive lever-presses without affecting the number of lever-presses followed by an attempt to collect a reward. In contrast, administration of 0.005, 0.01, 0.024, 0.036 and 0.05 of the D(2) antagonist haloperidol dose-dependently decreased both types of lever-presses. In addition, haloperidol at doses that decreased lever-pressing in the post-training signal attenuation procedure (0.036 and 0.05 mg/kg) had a similar effect in regular extinction, whereas an SCH 23390 dose that decreased compulsive lever-pressing in the post-training signal attenuation procedure (0.01 mg/kg) had no effect on regular extinction. On the basis of electrophysiological data on the response of dopamine neurons to the omission of an expected reward, these results were interpreted as suggesting that compulsive lever-pressing depends on a phasic decrease in the stimulation of D(1) receptors. The implications of these results for the pathophysiology and treatment of obsessive-compulsive disorder are discussed.

摘要

在食物获取行为的外部反馈减弱后,经历杠杆按压行为消退的大鼠会表现出过度的杠杆按压行为,且没有试图获取奖励的行为。这种行为可能类似于强迫症中出现的过度且不合理的行为。在本研究中,我们测试了这样一个假设,即信号衰减诱导的强迫行为是通过D(1)受体而非D(2)受体介导的。给予0.005、0.01和0.03mg/kg的D(1)拮抗剂SCH 23390可减少强迫性杠杆按压的次数,而不影响随后试图获取奖励的杠杆按压次数。相比之下,给予0.005、0.01、0.024、0.036和0.05的D(2)拮抗剂氟哌啶醇会剂量依赖性地减少两种类型的杠杆按压次数。此外,在训练后信号衰减程序中能减少杠杆按压次数的氟哌啶醇剂量(0.036和0.05mg/kg)在常规消退中也有类似效果,而在训练后信号衰减程序中能减少强迫性杠杆按压次数的SCH 23390剂量(0.01mg/kg)对常规消退没有影响。基于多巴胺神经元对预期奖励缺失的反应的电生理数据,这些结果被解释为表明强迫性杠杆按压依赖于D(1)受体刺激的阶段性减少。讨论了这些结果对强迫症病理生理学和治疗的意义。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验