Bakaeen L G, Winkler S, Neff P A
Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, University of Jordan, Amman.
J Oral Implantol. 2001;27(2):63-72. doi: 10.1563/1548-1336(2001)027<0063:TEOIDR>2.3.CO;2.
The purpose of this study was to (1) determine in vitro the effect of narrowing the buccolingual width of the occlusal table on the untightening torque required to loosen gold prosthetic screws after subjecting implants and implant-supported restorations to occlusal loads, and (2) to compare the incidence of screw loosening and values of untightening torque of the screws among crowns supported by 1 wide-diameter as opposed to 2 standard implants after loading in vitro. The restorations were divided into 4 groups (group 1, a narrow crown supported by one 5-mm wide-diameter implant; group 2, a narrow crown supported by 2 standard 3.75-mm-diameter implants; group 3, a wide crown supported by one 5-mm wide-diameter implant; and group 4, a wide crown supported by 2 standard 3.75-mm-diameter implants). A custom-designed chewing machine was used to simulate the grinding phase of the masticatory cycle and lateral excursions. The crowns were subjected to a 6-kg load for 16660 cycles over 5.5 hours and were loaded at the outer and inner inclines and cusp tips with an untightening loading pattern. The untightening torque was measured for the gold screws in the different groups before and after loading at 4 different locations for 8 cycles on the simulated chewing machine. A 1-way analysis of variance indicated a significant difference (P < .001) among the test groups. Pairwise multiple comparison tests (Scheffe) were carried out on mean "change scores." Group 3 was significantly different from the other groups, which were not significantly different from each other. Restoring missing molars with 1 wide-diameter implant had a greater incidence of screw loosening as compared with 2 implants. Narrowing the occlusal table of the restoration is critical when using 1 implant to support a missing molar. The untightening torque of gold screws was not affected by changing the width of the occlusal table of crowns supported by 2 implants.
(1)在体外确定缩小咬合面的颊舌宽度对在种植体和种植体支持的修复体承受咬合负荷后松开金修复螺丝所需的松开扭矩的影响;(2)比较在体外加载后,由1颗大直径种植体与2颗标准种植体支持的牙冠之间螺丝松动的发生率及螺丝的松开扭矩值。修复体分为4组(第1组,由1颗5毫米大直径种植体支持的窄牙冠;第2组,由2颗标准的3.75毫米直径种植体支持的窄牙冠;第3组,由1颗5毫米大直径种植体支持的宽牙冠;第4组,由2颗标准的3.75毫米直径种植体支持的宽牙冠)。使用定制设计的咀嚼机模拟咀嚼周期的研磨阶段和侧向偏移。牙冠在5.5小时内承受6千克的负荷,持续16660个周期,并以松开加载模式在外斜面、内斜面和牙尖处加载。在模拟咀嚼机上,于4个不同位置对不同组的金螺丝在加载前后进行8个周期的松开扭矩测量。单因素方差分析表明试验组之间存在显著差异(P <.001)。对平均“变化分数”进行了两两多重比较检验(谢费检验)。第3组与其他组有显著差异,其他组之间无显著差异。与使用2颗种植体相比,用1颗大直径种植体修复缺失磨牙时螺丝松动发生率更高。当使用1颗种植体支持缺失磨牙时,缩小修复体的咬合面至关重要。由2颗种植体支持的牙冠,改变其咬合面宽度不会影响金螺丝的松开扭矩。