Darcey Dennis, Lipscomb Hester J, Epling Carol, Pate William, Cherry Lorene P, Bernstein Jonathan
Division of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Department of Community and Family Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 22710, USA.
Arch Environ Health. 2002 May-Jun;57(3):239-46. doi: 10.1080/00039890209602943.
Clinical findings for 38 community residents who complained of symptoms they attributed to exposure to air emissions from nearby fiber processing and polyurethane foam manufacturing facilities are reported. Common complaints included headache, mucosal irritation, shortness of breath, chest tightness, and wheezing. Airway hyperreactivity, measured by methacholine challenge, was observed in 8 individuals (22% of those tested), who also reported temporal relationships between exposure to visible emissions or odors and symptoms consistent with environmentally induced asthma. Six individuals (18.2%) had antibodies to at least 1 of the 3 common industrial diisocyanates. The number of individuals with antibodies to diisocyanates, coupled with the absence of other diisocyanate exposure, was highly suggestive of environmental exposure. The findings raised concern that some residents may have become sensitized to toluene diisocyanate.
报告了38名社区居民的临床发现,这些居民抱怨他们的症状归因于接触附近纤维加工和聚氨酯泡沫制造设施排放的空气。常见的抱怨包括头痛、粘膜刺激、呼吸急促、胸闷和喘息。通过乙酰甲胆碱激发试验测量,8名个体(占测试者的22%)出现气道高反应性,他们还报告了接触可见排放物或气味与符合环境诱发哮喘症状之间的时间关系。6名个体(18.2%)对3种常见工业二异氰酸酯中的至少1种有抗体。有二异氰酸酯抗体的个体数量,加上没有其他二异氰酸酯接触史,强烈提示存在环境暴露。这些发现引发了人们对一些居民可能已对甲苯二异氰酸酯致敏的担忧。