Suppr超能文献

不同实验室采用不同方法对哺乳动物细胞DNA中基线8-氧代-7,8-二氢鸟嘌呤进行的比较分析:达成共识的一种方法。

Comparative analysis of baseline 8-oxo-7,8-dihydroguanine in mammalian cell DNA, by different methods in different laboratories: an approach to consensus.

出版信息

Carcinogenesis. 2002 Dec;23(12):2129-33. doi: 10.1093/carcin/23.12.2129.

Abstract

The European Standards Committee on Oxidative DNA Damage (ESCODD) was set up to resolve the problems associated with the measurement of background levels of oxidative DNA damage (in particular 8-oxo-7,8-dihydroguanine, or 8-oxoGua) in human cells. A tendency for DNA oxidation to occur during sample preparation prior to chromatography has been recognized as the source of a very substantial artefact. To assess the success of attempts to eliminate the artefact, ESCODD has distributed to its members standard samples of pig liver and HeLa cells for analysis. Estimates of 8-oxoGua in pig liver, using chromatographic techniques, ranged from 2.23 to 441 per 10(6) guanines, with a median of 10.47 per 10(6) guanines. Chromatographic analysis of HeLa cell DNA gave a range of 1.84 to 214 per 10(6) guanines with a median of 5.23 per 10(6) guanines. HeLa cell DNA was also analysed by an enzymic approach, in which whole cell DNA was treated with formamidopyrimidine DNA glycosylase, which nicks DNA at sites of 8-oxoGua, and the breaks measured with the comet assay, alkaline unwinding or alkaline elution. Values with these methods ranged from 0.06 to 4.988-oxoGua per 10(6) guanines, with a median of 0.79 per 10(6) guanines. Although there are clearly still serious discrepancies between methods and laboratories, the lowest estimates by chromatography (arguably those in which the artefact was best controlled) are only 2.5 times higher than the median value obtained with the enzymic approach.

摘要

欧洲氧化DNA损伤标准委员会(ESCODD)的设立是为了解决与人类细胞中氧化DNA损伤(特别是8-氧代-7,8-二氢鸟嘌呤,即8-氧代鸟嘌呤)背景水平测量相关的问题。在色谱分析前的样品制备过程中发生DNA氧化的趋势已被确认为一个非常严重的假象来源。为了评估消除该假象的尝试是否成功,ESCODD已向其成员分发猪肝和HeLa细胞的标准样品以供分析。使用色谱技术对猪肝中8-氧代鸟嘌呤的估计值为每10⁶个鸟嘌呤中有2.23至441个,中位数为每10⁶个鸟嘌呤中有10.47个。对HeLa细胞DNA进行色谱分析得到的范围是每10⁶个鸟嘌呤中有1.84至214个,中位数为每10⁶个鸟嘌呤中有5.23个。HeLa细胞DNA也通过酶法进行分析,即全细胞DNA用甲酰胺嘧啶DNA糖基化酶处理,该酶在8-氧代鸟嘌呤位点切割DNA,然后用彗星试验、碱性解旋或碱性洗脱测量断裂情况。这些方法得到的值范围是每10⁶个鸟嘌呤中有0.06至4.98个8-氧代鸟嘌呤,中位数为每10⁶个鸟嘌呤中有0.79个。尽管方法和实验室之间显然仍存在严重差异,但色谱法的最低估计值(可以说是假象控制得最好的那些值)仅比酶法获得的中位数高2.5倍。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验