• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

《多重情感形容词检查表修订版》日文版:编制与验证

The Japanese version of the Multiple Affect Adjective Checklist-Revised: development and validation.

作者信息

Yasuda Tomoyuki, Lubin Bernard, Kim Juhu, Van Whitlock Rodney

机构信息

University of Missouri at Kansas City 64110-2499, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Psychol. 2003 Jan;59(1):93-109. doi: 10.1002/jclp.10120.

DOI:10.1002/jclp.10120
PMID:12508334
Abstract

In order to develop a Japanese version of the Multiple Affect Adjective Checklist-Revised (MAACL-R), the 66 scored adjectives were translated into Japanese and translated back into English as recommended by Werner and Campbell (1971). Confirmatory factor analyses evidenced the existence of five first-order factors (i.e., the anxiety, depression, hostility, positive affect, and sensation-seeking factors) and the two second-order factors (i.e., the dysphoric and pleasant affect factors) underlying the response to the Japanese MAACL-R. Internal consistency ranged from .73 to .91, and four-week retest reliability ranged from .67 to .74 on the seven scales (Anxiety, Depression, Hostility, Positive Affect, Sensation Seeking, Dysphoria, and PASS). Although correlations with the scales of the State-Trait Personality Inventory, State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression scale, a sensation-seeking scale, and a subjective well-being scale indicated only acceptable discriminant validity, adequate convergent validity was evidenced by the examination of these correlations. The Japanese version of the MAACL-R seems to be ready for use in research.

摘要

为了开发《多重情感形容词检查表修订版》(MAACL-R)的日语版本,按照维尔纳和坎贝尔(1971年)的建议,将66个计分形容词翻译成日语,然后再翻译回英语。验证性因素分析证明,对日语版MAACL-R的反应存在五个一阶因素(即焦虑、抑郁、敌意、积极情感和感觉寻求因素)和两个二阶因素(即烦躁和愉快情感因素)。七个量表(焦虑、抑郁、敌意、积极情感、感觉寻求、烦躁和愉快情感)的内部一致性范围为0.73至0.91,四周重测信度范围为0.67至0.74。尽管与状态-特质人格量表、状态-特质焦虑量表、流行病学研究中心抑郁量表、感觉寻求量表和主观幸福感量表的相关性仅表明具有可接受的区分效度,但通过对这些相关性的检验证明了足够的聚合效度。MAACL-R的日语版本似乎已准备好用于研究。

相似文献

1
The Japanese version of the Multiple Affect Adjective Checklist-Revised: development and validation.《多重情感形容词检查表修订版》日文版:编制与验证
J Clin Psychol. 2003 Jan;59(1):93-109. doi: 10.1002/jclp.10120.
2
A study of affective temperaments in Hungary: internal consistency and concurrent validity of the TEMPS-A against the TCI and NEO-PI-R.匈牙利情感气质的一项研究:TEMPS-A相对于TCI和NEO-PI-R的内部一致性和同时效度。
J Affect Disord. 2008 Feb;106(1-2):45-53. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2007.03.016. Epub 2007 Aug 15.
3
[Validation of the German version of the 20-item Toronto Alexithymia Scale in normal persons and psychiatric patients].[20项多伦多述情障碍量表德文版在正常人和精神科患者中的效度验证]
Psychother Psychosom Med Psychol. 1996 Jan;46(1):23-8.
4
A grade four reading level key for the Multiple Affect Adjective Check List-Revised.《多重情感形容词检查表修订版》的四年级阅读水平关键。
Percept Mot Skills. 1998 Feb;86(1):119-25. doi: 10.2466/pms.1998.86.1.119.
5
The new MAACL scales with adolescents: preliminary reliability and validity determinations.针对青少年的新型MAACL量表:初步的信度和效度测定
Adolescence. 1986 Spring;21(81):81-6.
6
Psychometric properties of the grade 4 reading level Multiple Affect Adjective Check List-Revised with offenders.
Percept Mot Skills. 1998 Apr;86(2):551-60. doi: 10.2466/pms.1998.86.2.551.
7
Adjective checklist to assess the big five personality factors in the Argentine population.形容词检查表评估阿根廷人口的五大人格因素。
J Pers Assess. 2011 Jan;93(1):46-55. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2010.513708.
8
Validation of the Japanese version of the NEO Five-Factor Inventory in a large community sample.在一个大型社区样本中对日本版大五人格问卷(NEO Five-Factor Inventory)的验证。
Psychol Rep. 2001 Apr;88(2):443-9. doi: 10.2466/pr0.2001.88.2.443.
9
A comparison of the short and long forms of the Multiple Affect Adjective Check List-Revised (MAACL-R).《多重情感形容词检查表修订版(MAACL-R)》简短版与长版的比较。
J Clin Psychol. 2001 Mar;57(3):411-6. doi: 10.1002/jclp.1023.
10
[Translation and validation of the Revised Social Anhedonia Scale (SAS Social Anhedonia Scale, M.L. Eckblad, L.J. Chapman et al., 1982). Study of the internal and concurrent validity in 126 normal subjects].[修订版社交快感缺乏量表(SAS社交快感缺乏量表,M.L. 埃克布拉德、L.J. 查普曼等人,1982年)的翻译与验证。对126名正常受试者的内部效度和同时效度的研究]
Encephale. 1995 Nov-Dec;21(6):437-43.

引用本文的文献

1
Adolescents' Psychological Well-Being: A Multidimensional Measure.青少年心理健康:多维测量。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Oct 22;15(10):2325. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15102325.
2
The Clinical Ethnographic Interview: a user-friendly guide to the cultural formulation of distress and help seeking.临床民族志访谈:一种易于使用的方法,用于对困扰和寻求帮助的文化表现进行构建。
Transcult Psychiatry. 2012 Apr;49(2):302-22. doi: 10.1177/1363461511425877. Epub 2011 Dec 22.