Lubin B, Van Whitlock R
University of Missouri-Kansas City, USA.
Percept Mot Skills. 1998 Feb;86(1):119-25. doi: 10.2466/pms.1998.86.1.119.
Data from samples of College Students (n = 433), Adolescents (n = 746), and a community mental health center sample (Outpatients) (n = 202) were rescored using a scoring key that consisted of adjectives from the Multiple Affect Adjective Check List-Revised at or below the Grade 4 reading level (MAACL-R4). Factor analyses showed that, unlike the MAACL-R, a three-factor structure (Positive Affect 4, Anxious Depression 4, and Hostility 4) best described the 38 Grade 4 adjectives on the MAACL-R4. Estimates of reliability (internal consistency and test-retest) for each scale were acceptable. Correlations between scores on MAACL-R4 and four Self-rating Mood Scales showed expected convergent and discriminant validities. Also, patterns of means among the three groups could differentiate the nonreferred from referred samples.
来自大学生样本（n = 433）、青少年样本（n = 746）以及社区心理健康中心样本（门诊患者）（n = 202）的数据，使用一个评分标准重新计分，该评分标准由来自《多维情感形容词检查表修订版》中四年级及以下阅读水平的形容词组成（MAACL-R4）。因素分析表明，与MAACL-R不同，三因素结构（积极情感4、焦虑抑郁4和敌意4）最能描述MAACL-R4上的38个四年级形容词。每个量表的信度估计值（内部一致性和重测信度）是可以接受的。MAACL-R4得分与四个自评情绪量表之间的相关性显示出预期的聚合效度和区分效度。此外，三组之间的均值模式可以区分非转诊样本和转诊样本。
