Milas Luka, Mason Kathryn A, Liao Zhongxing, Ang Kian K
Department of Experimental Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas M D Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Box 66, Houston, Texas 77030-4009, USA.
Head Neck. 2003 Feb;25(2):152-67. doi: 10.1002/hed.10232.
The use of chemotherapeutic drugs in combination with radiotherapy has become a common strategy for the treatment of advanced cancer. Solid evidence exists showing that chemotherapy administered during the course of radiotherapy (concurrent chemoradiotherapy) increases both local tumor control and patient survival in a number of cancer sites, including head and neck cancer. These therapy improvements, however, have been achieved at the expense of considerable toxicity, which underscores the need for further improvements.
The current status of chemoradiotherapy clinical trials for head and neck cancer and research on the emerging treatment improvements were reviewed. A review of potential treatment improvement strategies focused on preclinical investigations on newer chemotherapeutic agents, notably taxanes and nucleoside analogues, as well as on molecular targets such as epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) or cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) enzyme.
Concurrent, but not induction (drugs given before radiotherapy), chemoradiotherapy improves locoregional tumor control and survival benefit in head and neck carcinoma relative to radiotherapy alone. In comparison, both concurrent and induction chemoradiotherapy showed therapeutic advantage over radiotherapy alone in the treatment of lung cancer. These therapeutic improvements were achieved with standard chemotherapeutic drugs, most commonly cisplatin-based chemotherapy. Biologically, chemotherapy interacts with radiation through a number of mechanisms, including inhibition of cellular repair, cell cycle effects, and inhibition of tumor cell regeneration. Potential avenues emerged to further improve chemoradiotherapy. One of these involves the newer chemotherapeutic agents, taxanes and nucleoside analogues, which in preclinical studies exhibited strong tumor radiosensitization and therapeutic gain. The clinical benefit of these agents is currently under testing. Another approach for improvement of chemoradiotherapy consists of inhibiting molecules selectively or preferentially expressed on tumor cells, such as EGFR and COX-2, both shown to render cellular resistance to drugs or radiation. Agents that selectively inhibit these molecules are becoming available at a rapid rate, and many of them have been shown in preclinical testing to be highly effective in improving tumor radioresponse or chemoresponse without affecting normal tissues.
Concurrent chemoradiotherapy, using standard chemotherapeutic agents, has emerged as an effective treatment for advanced cancer, but unfortunately at the expense of considerable increase in normal tissue toxicity. There are a number of potential emerging treatment strategies to further improve chemoradiotherapy. One consists of using newer chemotherapeutic drugs, which in preclinical studies are potent enhancers of tumor radioresponse. Another approach consists of targeting EGFR or COX-2 with selective inhibitors of these molecules.
化疗药物与放疗联合使用已成为治疗晚期癌症的常用策略。确凿证据表明,在放疗过程中给予化疗(同步放化疗)可提高包括头颈癌在内的多个癌症部位的局部肿瘤控制率和患者生存率。然而,这些治疗改善是以相当大的毒性为代价实现的,这突出表明需要进一步改进。
回顾了头颈癌放化疗临床试验的现状以及对新出现的治疗改进的研究。对潜在治疗改进策略的综述聚焦于对新型化疗药物(特别是紫杉烷类和核苷类似物)的临床前研究,以及对表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)或环氧合酶-2(COX-2)酶等分子靶点的研究。
相对于单纯放疗,同步而非诱导(放疗前给予药物)放化疗可改善头颈癌的局部区域肿瘤控制和生存获益。相比之下,同步和诱导放化疗在肺癌治疗中均显示出优于单纯放疗的治疗优势。这些治疗改进是通过标准化疗药物实现的,最常用的是以顺铂为基础的化疗。从生物学角度来看,化疗通过多种机制与放疗相互作用,包括抑制细胞修复(细胞周期效应)和抑制肿瘤细胞再生。出现了进一步改善放化疗的潜在途径。其中之一涉及新型化疗药物紫杉烷类和核苷类似物,它们在临床前研究中表现出强大的肿瘤放射增敏作用和治疗增益。这些药物的临床益处目前正在测试中。另一种改善放化疗的方法是选择性或优先抑制肿瘤细胞上表达的分子,如EGFR和COX-2,二者均显示出会使细胞对药物或放疗产生抗性。选择性抑制这些分子的药物正在迅速出现,并且它们中的许多已在临床前测试中显示出在不影响正常组织情况下提高肿瘤放射反应或化疗反应的高效性。
使用标准化疗药物的同步放化疗已成为晚期癌症的有效治疗方法,但不幸的是会导致正常组织毒性大幅增加。有许多潜在的新出现的治疗策略可进一步改善放化疗。一种策略是使用新型化疗药物,它们在临床前研究中是肿瘤放射反应的有效增强剂。另一种方法是用这些分子的选择性抑制剂靶向EGFR或COX-2。