Antoniazzi M, Celinski M, Alcock J
Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, Neuro-Rehabilitation Programme, Toronto, Canada.
Disabil Rehabil. 2002 Dec 15;24(18):948-53. doi: 10.1080/0963828021000007879.
To compare injured worker and health professional ratings of psychosocial variables as they relate to recovery.
Seventy patients and 70 health care staff at an injured worker rehabilitation centre completed a 17-item checklist. Each subject selected five psychosocial variables believed to be most important to recovery. Group ratings were compared using chi-square with a Bonferroni adjustment.
In general, patients and health professionals agreed on the relative importance of 15 of 17 variables. However, the groups did differ significantly on two items--staff rated 'self-responsibility' higher than patients, while patients rated 'coping with pain' higher than staff.
The ratings reflect the occasionally divergent goals and expectations of the rehabilitation staff and patient groups. Consequently, some patients may be moved into inappropriate treatment modalities, resulting in non-compliance. Being aware of patient beliefs and expectations should assist health care professionals in generating improved rehabilitation outcomes by promoting better co-operation through shared perceptions and goals.
比较受伤工人和健康专业人员对与康复相关的社会心理变量的评级。
一家受伤工人康复中心的70名患者和70名医护人员完成了一份包含17个项目的清单。每个受试者选择了五个他们认为对康复最重要的社会心理变量。使用经邦费罗尼校正的卡方检验比较组间评级。
总体而言,患者和健康专业人员对17个变量中的15个变量的相对重要性达成了一致。然而,两组在两个项目上存在显著差异——工作人员对“自我责任感”的评级高于患者,而患者对“应对疼痛”的评级高于工作人员。
这些评级反映了康复工作人员和患者群体偶尔不同的目标和期望。因此,一些患者可能会被安排到不适当的治疗方式中,导致不依从。了解患者的信念和期望应有助于医护人员通过促进基于共同认知和目标的更好合作来改善康复效果。