Batra Vikas, Patkar Ashwin A, Weibel Sandra, Leone Frank T
Division of Critical Care, Pulmonary, Allergic and Immunologic Diseases, Thomas Jefferson University, 1025 Walnut Street, 805 College Bldg, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA.
Prim Care. 2002 Sep;29(3):629-48. doi: 10.1016/s0095-4543(02)00016-7.
Tobacco use represents a rare confluence of interesting circumstances. Elements of inheritable risk combine with powerful neuropharmacology and a ubiquitous environmental exposure and result in an epidemic that claims over 430,000 lives and costs us over $100 billion annually. It is the single most important remediable public health problem in the United States. Most smokers want to quit smoking and a simple advice from a physician can increase the likelihood of doing so. Moreover, there are a number of pharmacologic and behavioral therapies that are proven to be effective in smoking cessation. Yet, there is an apparent reluctance among physicians to address smoking cessation, perhaps due to a sense of frustration or low self-efficacy. Physicians play an important role in smoking cessation, and intensive interventions are necessary to improve their participation and efficacy. Teaching practical smoking cessation techniques within medical school curricula, with an opportunity for standardized practice and self-evaluation, may be an effective strategy to improve physician practice in this area. Since most smokers try their first cigarette before the age of 18, and youth smoking is on the rise, targeted interventions aimed at preventing initiation and encouraging cessation of smoking among youth are needed. For all tobacco users, a better understanding of the pharmacology and physiology of nicotine addiction may translate into targeted and individualized treatment and prevention strategies, which may improve success rates dramatically. To better control this epidemic, and to meet the nation's public health goals for the year 2010 [145], local tobacco control interventions need to be multifaceted and well integrated into regional and national efforts [146]. Because of the physician's unique societal role with respect to tobacco, doctors may indeed find it possible to impact public opinion and significantly reduce the toll of tobacco by acting at the public health and public policy levels [147]. Those interested in engaging in the public health debate can do more than relay facts about tobacco and health. Involvement in tobacco-control issues provides the opportunity to impact the environmental influences promoting smoking among patients, and is likely to be synergistic with efforts to help smokers quit within the office. Physicians who take steps to engage in local public health initiatives are likely to magnify the effects of their efforts at the bedside [148, 149].
吸烟是一系列有趣情况的罕见交汇。可遗传风险因素与强大的神经药理学以及无处不在的环境暴露相结合,导致了一场每年夺走超过43万人生命、花费超过1000亿美元的流行病。它是美国最重要的可补救公共卫生问题。大多数吸烟者想戒烟,医生的简单建议就能增加他们戒烟的可能性。此外,有许多药物和行为疗法已被证明对戒烟有效。然而,医生们显然不愿提及戒烟问题,这可能是由于挫败感或自我效能感较低。医生在戒烟方面起着重要作用,需要强化干预措施来提高他们的参与度和成效。在医学院课程中教授实用的戒烟技巧,并提供标准化练习和自我评估的机会,可能是提高医生在这方面实践能力的有效策略。由于大多数吸烟者在18岁之前就开始吸第一支烟,且青少年吸烟率呈上升趋势,因此需要有针对性的干预措施来预防青少年开始吸烟并鼓励他们戒烟。对于所有烟草使用者来说,更好地了解尼古丁成瘾的药理学和生理学知识可能会转化为有针对性的个性化治疗和预防策略,这可能会大幅提高成功率。为了更好地控制这场流行病,并实现国家2010年的公共卫生目标[145],地方烟草控制干预措施需要多方面进行,并很好地融入区域和国家的努力之中[146]。由于医生在烟草问题上具有独特的社会角色,医生们确实可能会发现,通过在公共卫生和公共政策层面采取行动,他们有可能影响公众舆论并显著降低烟草造成的损害[147]。那些有兴趣参与公共卫生辩论的人所能做的不止是传达有关烟草与健康的事实。参与烟草控制问题提供了一个机会,可以影响促使患者吸烟的环境因素,并且很可能与在诊室帮助吸烟者戒烟的努力产生协同效应。采取措施参与地方公共卫生倡议的医生可能会放大他们在床边所做努力的效果[148, 149]。